Save content
Have you found this content useful? Use the button above to save it to your profile.
AIA

NDO or LDF - which do I use?

by
14th Sep 2009
Save content
Have you found this content useful? Use the button above to save it to your profile.

Additions to the FAQ’s on the HMRC website indicate that taxpayers and advisers are already confused by the two disclosure opportunities which are currently running. HMRC has made clear that it is not possible for taxpayers to move themselves from the general disclosure opportunity to the more favourable Liechtenstein facility simply by moving their cash.

New Disclosure Opportunity (NDO)

The new disclosure opportunity launched on 1 September and provides the chance for taxpayers to declare income held in offshore accounts which has not been declared for UK tax. The opportunity applies to accounts anywhere in the world with the exception of Liechtenstein, and the requirement to declare previously untaxed income applies to individuals, trustees and companies, and also personal representatives of deceased individuals. The key dates are :

  • Notify of the intention to make a disclosure by 30 November 2009. Failure to do this will mean that NDO cannot be used to make the disclosure. The online notification facility opens on 1 October, but the deadline remains 30 November.
  • Make the disclosure and pay the tax by 31 January 2010 unless the disclosure is made online in which case the deadline is 12 March 2010.

The disclosure must include all unpaid tax liabilities whether or not they relate to offshore accounts and assets. The reduced penalties through the NDO scheme only apply to offshore accounts. The rates of penalty are :

  • Nil if the total unpaid liability disclosed is less than £1,000
  • Nil if, exceptionally the underpayment arose from innocent error
  • Nil in relation to defaults by now deceased taxpayers (up to the date of death)
  • 10% for most liabilities under NDO, but
  • 20% if the taxpayer was contacted in 2007 regarding the original Disclosure Opportunity.

Certain disclosures are unlikely to be settled under NDO, including :

  • Disclosures that are found to be materially incorrect or incomplete when checked by HMRC for accuracy and completeness.
  • Disclosures from customers where HMRC have begun an investigation or enquiry into their affairs. Those who want to disclose liabilities should tell the person conducting the enquiry. A full and early disclosure will influence the amount of penalty HMRC seek in the ongoing investigation or enquiry.
  • Disclosures where HMRC believe the money that is the subject of the disclosure is the proceeds of Serious Organised Crime. This includes VAT Missing Trader fraud, VAT Bogus Registration fraud or Organised Tax Credit fraud and those involved in any wider criminality (such as an ongoing police investigation).

There is no assurance that criminal proceedings will not result from a disclosure, but the guidance indicates that with a full and accurate disclosure this is unlikely.

Liechtenstein Disclosure Facility (LDF)

This facility is open to those holding accounts or assets in Liechtenstein. The facility is a very different approach as it relies on the work that HMRC and the banks in Liechtenstein will be doing together over the next few years. The best understanding of the facility can be gained by reading the Memorandum of Understanding signed on 11 August 2009.

Essentially, the Government in Liechtenstein has agreed that following the period of disclosure those holding accounts who cannot provide a certificate of tax compliance will have their accounts closed. Thus it will only be possible to continue to hold an account in Liechtenstein if the holder has come forward, paid all relevant tax due and can present a certificate from HMRC confirming this fact. The bankers and other financial intermediaries will be contacting account holders between now and 31 March 2015, but those with accounts in Liechtenstein can come forward early and make a disclosure.

The LDF has a number of significantly different characteristics from the NDO. The key issues are :

  • Income must be declared and tax paid in relation to tax years starting on or after 1 April 1999. No such time limit applies under NDO.
  • The LDF includes an assurance that criminal investigation will not be undertaken
  • There is an optional single composite rate of tax, which will cover all tax, NIC and duty, including VAT and SDLT. This is 40%. Under NDO the actual rates of tax must be used. Those declaring under LDF can use actual rates of tax if they prefer.

The penalty rate is 10%, unless exceptionally the non disclosure arose from an innocent error, and interest will be due on any liabilities declared in the same way as for the NDO. However, the FAQ’s make it clear that it is not possible to close an offshore account and move the funds to Liechtenstein in order to migrate from NDO to LDF as the disclosure will apply to the period when the account was open.
 

Tags:

Replies (4)

Please login or register to join the discussion.

avatar
By Iain Macleod
16th Sep 2009 11:53

New Disclosure Opportunity- publicity needed

For the NDO to work HMRC need to publicise the opportunity for offshore account holders.

It looks as though HMRC won't be writing to account holders before the notification deadline of 30 November 2009. Maybe Banks will tell clients they've had to hand over account details.

While HMRC ads on this and other sites are welcome, to get the message across they need to use TV, radio and popular print media too. 

Thanks (0)
Rebecca Benneyworth profile image
By Rebecca Benneyworth
16th Sep 2009 22:47

I couldn't agree more

I have talked briefly about this on lectures this week and I am not convinced that advisors are aware that this is a very different kettle of fish to the last disclosure opportunity. The onus is very much more on the client to come forward - prompted by advertising. I guess many accountants should really be putting the word out to clients to ensure that those who need to put thier hands up realise what is going on. I wouldn't want to be in their shoes come 1 December otherwise. The trouble is, I suspect many accountants think their clients wouldn't have offshore monies, particualarly in small practices, but I think we should all be raising the issue with our clients irrespective, to ensure they have the opportunity to make a disclosure if necessary.

Thanks (0)
avatar
By Johhny
17th Sep 2009 12:32

I also agree

Last time around the banks (and HMRC in most cases) wrote to the affected customers and advised that data had been passed over to HMRC. That is not happening this time around. In many cases the bank will not have collated and handed the data over to HMRC by the end of the registration period on 30 November.

We have been trying to raise awareness of the NDO/LDF both with clients and externally. The registration deadline is not really very far away but it is amazing how many people  haven't heard of it when the subject is raised. Everyone needs to tell their other contacts as well as their clients so that word gets around as many people as possible.

Anyone who is a bit uncomfortable raising the issue with clients can use HMRC's lack of action as an excuse. For example, how about stressing that they are not suggesting the client may be affected but that it is such an important matter it needs to be brought to the attention of as many people as possible. Not much is being done by HMRC in that respect so can the client/contact pass the intelligence on to thier contacts as well.

 

John Cassidy

Tax investigations partner, PKF

 

Thanks (0)
avatar
By mickeyparish
16th Nov 2009 12:49

Liechtenstein Disclosure Facility

Good morning

 

Rebecca Benneyworth wrote:

"However, the FAQ’s make it clear that it is not possible to close an offshore account and move the funds to Liechtenstein in order to migrate from NDO to LDF as the disclosure will apply to the period when the account was open."
 

There was an article in the Daily Telegraph on Saturday 14th November suggesting otherwise, except for accounts originating via UK based banks ( I paraphrase) .  The current FAQs on the HMRC website appear to confirm the DT's version.

What's the current view ? 

Thanks (0)