Save content
Have you found this content useful? Use the button above to save it to your profile.
AIA

TAX NEWS: ICAEW issues UITF40 guidance. By Nichola Ross Martin

by
11th May 2006
Save content
Have you found this content useful? Use the button above to save it to your profile.

By now most accountants should be up to speed on the topic of UITF 40 Revenue recognition and service contracts. If you are still uncertain on whether to accrue half the fee for a half-finished tax return, then look no further than the latest guidance issued by the ICEAW.

The guidance gives practical examples on how one accounts for the new Abstract. The examples provided by the guidance are:

  • A TV personality with uncertain repeat fees
  • A song writer and performance royalties
  • A tax accountant and half a tax return
  • An accountant and advisory work
  • Accountancy work and resignation
  • Barristers ' no win, no fee
  • Barrister - pay at the end
  • Barrister ' fixed fees
  • Barrister ' legal aid
  • A joiner and a half completed bookcase
  • Tax planning points
    One key point to remember is that one must apply the provisions consistently year on year. As a degree of judgement is required, an adjustment under UITF 40 may be open to scrutiny, and will be routinely checked in enquiry cases.

    In the past, HMRC have been less focused on the valuation of work in progress, as sole traders and partnerships did not have to account for the cost of a proprietor's own time.

    Remember to review and record details of each client's working and billing practices for UIFT 40 valuation purposes. These need to be kept on file to provide a detailed record of the accounting policy for each client business, together with any assumptions made year on year.

    The opening adjustment
    As the opening or prior year adjustment for UITF 40 effectively takes that part of income out of the current year profits, allowing the tax liability on the adjustment to be spread over the next three to six years, there is tax relief in the form of a deferred tax bill. The temptation may be to include as large as an adjustment as possible to defer tax liabilities.

    The problem of course with this tactic is that one has to consider what income should also be recognised at the year end. As the basis must be applied consistently, this may lead to a higher adjustment at the year end which totally defeats the tax advantages of the deferred tax bill.

    Nichola Ross Martin

    Tags:

    Replies (3)

    Please login or register to join the discussion.

    avatar
    By michaelblake
    15th May 2006 12:10

    A link to the ICAEW guidance

    Could we have a link to the new ICAEW guidance that the article refers to please?

    Thanks (0)
    avatar
    By AnonymousUser
    15th May 2006 12:49

    Link to ICAEW guidance
    The ICAEW guidance can be found on the ICAEW website at http://www.icaew.co.uk/index.cfm?route=135435
    The accompanying Press Release is at http://www.icaew.co.uk/index.cfm?route=135756

    Thanks (0)
    avatar
    By ACDWebb
    15th May 2006 12:36

    Seems to be
    HERE but restricted to members.

    ATT notes are HERE

    Thanks (0)