TV makers latch on to tax
- In an Any Answers thread started by Richard Willis, Constantly Confused commented: “I just enjoyed how outraged my wife got while watching it while I just nodded and said, ‘Yep, that’s happened to our clients.’ It’s pretty depressing that nothing in the program shocked me, it was all things I had seen first hand, and I’m sure I’m not alone.”
- “Quite lazy journalism,” added Jason Dormer. “For an organisation that size, to find only two whistleblowers coming out with "Management don’t listen to staff" etc was hardly cutting edge. And they didn’t tell us anything about the coding notices that most of the public didn’t know already.”
- In a sequence of posts on his Tax Buzz blog, Mark Lee considered the documentary “a mishmash that attempted to cover too many disparate topics” that failed as a result to reach any meaningful conclusions.
This time, Richard Murphy has led the profession’s critical charge. In his
, he pointed out, “Durkin has a history of producing documentaries that have been open to challenge with regard to the facts,” notably with last Channel 4 documentary that questioned the imapact of global warming. The Tax horror show documentary is not so much based on fact as a desire to radically transform the structure of our society, he argued.