Share this content

1 Property Investment Company, FRS 102 or FRS 105?

Didn't find your answer?

Hey all

Just taken on a 1 property property investment company and looking to see if FRS 105 is an option. According to info Ive read here then it is, however on HMRC website they say "investment" companies dont qualify for FRS 105. Company hits all the criteria as well. Its never been valued and never accounted for deferred tax!

Is FRS 105 an option?

Thanks

Replies (9)

Please login or register to join the discussion.

avatar
By paul.benny
08th Mar 2021 08:57

Maybe you could post a link to the HMRC guidance you're referring to. My guess is that is referring to companies investing in shares rather than companies that hold investment property.

Thanks (0)
Replying to paul.benny:
avatar
By Paul Crowley
08th Mar 2021 09:23

+1
Do not have any so never really considered
But just one property?
And we are talking about accounts, not tax

Thanks (0)
By Duggimon
08th Mar 2021 09:03

Investment undertaking is defined here: https://www.legislation.gov.uk/eudr/2013/34/article/2

(14)‘investment undertakings’ means:
(a)undertakings the sole object of which is to invest their funds in various securities, real property and other assets, with the sole aim of spreading investment risks and giving their shareholders the benefit of the results of the management of their assets,

Strictly speaking that seems to rule it out, but I don't know if that's a harsh interpretation.

Personally I'd do it under FRS 102 1A anyway because I don't think FRS 105 can show a true and fair view for a property company.

Thanks (0)
Replying to Duggimon:
avatar
By nrw
08th Mar 2021 11:42

Duggimon wrote:

with the sole aim of spreading investment risks

One investment property isn't a spread of investment risk.

Thanks (0)
Replying to nrw:
By Duggimon
08th Mar 2021 15:46

Fair enough. FRS 105 is still the wrong standard for a property investment company, though I accept it's not actually against the standard's rules to use it anyway.

Thanks (0)
avatar
By Wanderer
08th Mar 2021 09:20

goosepoo wrote:

Is FRS 105 an option?

Yes.
Thanks (0)
avatar
By goosepoo
08th Mar 2021 09:32

Thanks for the replies all, decision made. 105 it is.

Thanks (0)
Melchett
By thestudyman
08th Mar 2021 23:25

Remember the revaluation model is not allowed in frs 105!

Thanks (0)
Replying to thestudyman:
avatar
By andrew1211
11th Mar 2021 12:44

Yes good, especially when moving a development property from stock into fixed assets......

Thanks (0)
Share this content