Advice re bankrupt shareholder

Bankrupt shareholder - notes to accounts

Didn't find your answer?

I am preparing company accounts. One material shareholder (50%) is now bankrupt. Disclosing he is bankrupt in the "Controlling Party" section in the notes to the accounts could be harmful for the company's business, as it is likely major customers and suppliers would want to do a company search, and not want to do business with the company if they see a bankrupt shareholder is involved. As I understand it, the shareholder could have his shares taken off him by the Official Receiver, or the Official Receiver could instruct this shareholder on how to vote. Any advice would be most appreciated.

Replies (7)

Please login or register to join the discussion.

avatar
By Bobbo
27th Jun 2024 11:26

You haven't stated what standard you're preparing accounts under, do you *need* a controlling party note?

Thanks (1)
avatar
By Tax Dragon
27th Jun 2024 11:35

A question (I have no idea of the answer): if as stated in the OP someone can control how a 50% shareholder must vote, must that someone be disclosed as a PSC?

Thanks (1)
avatar
By Paul Crowley
27th Jun 2024 12:29

Maybe prepare the basic accounts and wait out to see what happens. File later?

Thanks (0)
avatar
By paul.benny
27th Jun 2024 12:34

FRS102 para 33.5 requires disclosure of parent-subsidary relationships but there is no requirement to identify controlling shareholders within the financial statements.

Thanks (0)
Replying to paul.benny:
avatar
By paul.benny
27th Jun 2024 14:25

I should have said "no requirement to disclose controlling shareholders *of stand-alone companies*"

Thanks (0)
avatar
By accounts 2u ltd
27th Jun 2024 14:16

The company's accounts are prepared under FRS 102. The company meets 2 out of the 3 criteria for being a micro-entity, and all 3 criteria for being a small company.

Thanks (0)
Replying to accounts 2u ltd:
avatar
By Bobbo
27th Jun 2024 15:15

Full FRS 102 or FRS 102 Section 1A? Presumably the latter if all small company criteria met.

Can't see there is a need to disclose the controlling party (debateable anyway whether 50% shareholding makes someone "controlling")

Potentially more relevant is does the company rely on this shareholder for funding? If so does the company have going concern issues?

Thanks (1)