Share this content

Interesting deadlock client case

Didn't find your answer?

See para 14 (we see this sort of question asked here a quite lot).

Rather annoyingly, it does not say what the correct process would have been. Perhaps it's this for all instructions from multi-member companies/clients?

"As a director/partner/LLP member you are instructing me to act for the firm. Are you really entitled to do so? Who says? I want to speak with the other directors/partners/members and have their written confirmation that you are able to instruct me."

Lots of interesting looking related case law here:

Replies (0)

Please login or register to join the discussion.

There are currently no replies, be the first to post a reply.

Share this content