Share this content

Interesting fraudulent asset protection BO case

https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Ch/2021/1954.html

Didn't find your answer?

Judge basically says there is no sanction for a fraudulent asset protection scheme (and a fraudulent detrimental reliance is still good enough for a constructive trust per para 62), so fraud does pay (in some cases) after all. 

https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Ch/2021/1954.html

I'm not sure why the "clean hands" doctrine was not deployed, as in this similar fraudulent asset protection BO case that went the other way:  https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Ch/2021/597.html

Replies (0)

Please login or register to join the discussion.

There are currently no replies, be the first to post a reply.

Share this content