Share this content
2

Interesting loan charge HRA 1998 challenge case

https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Admin/2020/3382.html

Didn't find your answer?

Taxpayer predictably lost. Incidentally, St Matthews was my case and most tax lawyers agree Vos LJ was wrong there re "possessions" for A1P1 purposes (but you'd have to go to SC to prove him wrong I expect).

https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Admin/2020/3382.html

Replies (2)

Please login or register to join the discussion.

Psycho
By Wilson Philips
15th Feb 2020 14:02

Justin Bryant wrote:
Incidentally, St Matthews was my case

That explains a lot.
Thanks (0)
Psycho
By Wilson Philips
15th Feb 2020 14:03

[duplicate]

Thanks (0)
Share this content