Interesting tax scheme (& other) negligence case

Didn't find your answer?

Interesting re limitation (para 239 et seq) and other issues e.g. measure of damages at para 277 et seq.

In particular, no duty of care on the accountant per para 263 (a sort of mirror image of Mehjoo v Harben Barker).

The claimant's oral evidence was not too great to put it mildly per para 266 et seq.

Overall, a fairly comprehensive defeat for the claimants. Their lawyers may have to re-write all this:

Replies (0)

Please login or register to join the discussion.

There are currently no replies, be the first to post a reply.