Replies (7)
Please login or register to join the discussion.
Thanks in advance for any input
Try to use the phrase 'push back' less.
Other than that, HMRC are right (about the FTT bit).
FTT decisions are persuasive, not binding.
But, if you want to disagree with one, you should provide good reasons for doing so.
(HMRC simply ignore them, of course!)
(I agree with Lone Wolf. There is something behind your question! Dog food? Flat Rate Scheme? Something else?)
I think Lone Wolf was perhaps talking about the same problem I seem to have, which is that the list of queries showed more text for the question than was visible when I clicked on the question. For me all I saw is the statement "Is a FTT decision case law (Re Skinner)?". But now that text on the list page has gone too, so has the OP edited the post?
But you are right of course on the main point, Les.
IBut now that text on the list page has gone too, so has the OP edited the post?
Yes the OP has turned a good question into a pointless thread in which we moan about Sift not changing the rules.
If anyone has the original title, summary and text, please let me know and I will re-add.