I have a client that has 3 limited companies, all pubs, all same shareholders and directors. One of the pubs has made a massive loss. Is it legal to put the other 2 companies into the company with the loss to try claw back or would this be seen as tax avoidance?
Replies (14)
Please login or register to join the discussion.
A kneejerk reaction?
Assuming March or earlier,loss can go back for last year and prior, balance carried forward.
Is loss bigger than three years worth of profits?
Carrying the losses back wasn't considered. I said I would find out if it could be done.
The companies really need to take some advice. It sounds a precarious situation and so they need to best advice possible.
There's nothing illegal about transferring the trading businesses all into one company, but it's complicated and if you're asking about that aspect I would seek some outside help on the transactions and taxes involved in doing so.
I thought you meant CT avoidance (using the losses).
You mean: is it avoidance to channel the money in the good companies through the debts owed to the directors in the bad company so it can be taken out tax free? Yes.
But if you think merging two good companies into a third bad one is difficult*, you should try merging two threads. (More irony?)
https://www.accountingweb.co.uk/any-answers/merging-limited-companies
* Never mind the tax mess - is it even legal?
You did create two by pressing one of the buttons twice.
It is common recurring problem with questions and replies usually because the site does not have consistent spead of reaction.
See the yellow go blue and it looks like not pressed. Move the cursor and if button goes back to yellow then true it was not pressed
If it stays blue but nothing happens then it is slow and a second press creates two postings
A double click and you have two postings
Recently we had three identical Blogs from the same person
Any sarcasm was aimed at Aweb's apparent inability to merge threads (so while it might not be strictly necessary, I don't see why you have taken umbrage).
How long ago did bad company cease trading?
Actually that doesn't matter - cessation terminates the accounting period.
@OP - did you consider terminal loss relief? Or have there always been losses?
Help? Yes. Advise? Not in the way I use that word.
Though I would say that, if the only reason you are entering into a commercial transaction is tax, and you wouldn't contemplate (let alone do) it but for tax, then you really do need to step back and ask yourself whether it's the right thing to do. Dogs and tails and all that.
Also:
a) you need to be dead certain that the tax advantage you think is there really is there;
b) if there's any anti-avoidance that might be in point and that tests motive, you're gonna fail that test.
Your a) is using the loss. That can only work if the trade(s) you are thinking of importing into badco will stand in the shoes of the old trade to the extent that they can be considered one and the same - i.e. it wasn't a cessation, it was a hiatus. In your shoes (assuming you are the advisor) I might start the tax analysis with a review of case law that might inform a conclusion on that point.
Of course, as well as the tax analysis, your client will need to establish whether it's legal (IANAIP... but Lisa is). And that the landlords/brewers/other suppliers don't mind an insolvent company taking on the leases etc. And that the licensing can be sorted. And all the other gubbins that'll need to be done can in fact be done.
That is, if they're serious about this.