Share this content

More iffy online SDLT guidance

It's everywhere

Didn't find your answer?

Just seen this. How on earth can works as consideration for SDLT purposes (para 10, Sch 4 FA 2003) have anything to do with cash as consideration (which is what the Prudential case is about).

Just coz in Prudential the cash was for building/construction work has got nothing to do with building work itself potentially being consideration, obviously.  

Replies (0)

Please login or register to join the discussion.

There are currently no replies, be the first to post a reply.

Share this content