Partners 1& 2 put £5000 into a personal account as the business account was not open, started to purchase items for the business. Currently these figures are showing as capital investment in the partner equity account.
The partnership agreement reads:-
The initial capital shall be in the form of a loan of £xxx from 1&2 to the partnership and the partnership shall use their best endeavours to repay this as quickly as possible.
The business is now closed, nothing has been repaid and there are no funds in the bank.
Should this be showing as equity or a loan within the liabilites
Replies (12)
Please login or register to join the discussion.
It doesn't really matter , so no liquid funds to repay it, I'd just have a capital account analysed by partner where profits, capital drawings etc are posted , the partners can do anything they want ( change the agreement etc) provided they all agree
Don't know who "they" are but if a creditor of the partnership all partners are jointly and severably responsible for all partnership debts ...for example if you are an equity partner with 25% profit share a creditor can still pursue you for 100% of the partnership debt ..this is basic law that all qualified accountants are schooled in
So four partners two of whom were required to put in a loan?
Did the partnership use its best endeavours to repay this loan as quickly as possible as specified in the partnership agreement?
If it may get messy then I would stick to exactly what the agreement states rather than allow the accounts to misrepresent the agreement (regardless of how trivial it may seem).
You told us the agreement said "The initial capital shall be in the form of a loan". Isn't that enough said?
I agree Tax Dragon but if partners 1 & 2 prevented 3 & 4 from making a go of it, how can they go after 3 & 4 and for £5K, is it worth it?
I agree Tax Dragon but if partners 1 & 2 prevented 3 & 4 from making a go of it, how can they go after 3 & 4 and for £5K, is it worth it?
The drawings of partners 3 & 4 do need to be looked into.
Those are of course (the) pertinent questions.
But presumably they've all been asked - and answered - long before the OP (was) posted here.
It doesn't matter if its shown as a loan or capital.. all partners are jointly and severably liable for all 3rd party debts ...but frankly from the OP ramblings ..it sounds like a crock of sh#t that is best avoided by any accountant and left to the solicitor vultures who are welcome to the mess created by partners who can't sort their differences out amongst themselves
I would stick with adhering to the partnership agreement. Sounds like partners 3&4 would settle for it being equity as there will be nothing to distribute and all things being equal, no liabilities to settle. As the loan, then partners 1&2 have some gripe over non payment and presumably some redress through the courts if they could prove some form of negligence; even if fruitless.
If you treated it as equity how would respond to partners 1&2 if they challenge the (apparent) fact that the partnership agreement clearly stated loan and they invested on that basis? By doing what the paperwork says you remain impartial as you should.
Obviously there may be more to it but that would be my stance unless further facts suggest otherwise.
Good luck.
Tell them to stop acting like children and sort it out amoungst themselves..otherwise the first instalment of legal fees will make their loans look like chicken feed
Then take a back seat until they pay your costs to date