I have a client who adequately keeps purchases invoices, writes up most sales invoices and does almost all transactions through the business bank account. However he does not write up books and has claimed SEISS 1 to 4 without adding up his turnover at all. I have just completed accounts, turnover down 18% but as a different mix of work and less materials purchases net profit only down by £400!
Would you people reading this recomended he uses his Gateway account to repay the first three grants or shall I recomend doing it by the Tax return?
Why HMRC made such a thing about the taxpayer had to make the claims without the assistant of the accounmtant I do not know.
Replies (11)
Please login or register to join the discussion.
The trouble is you are looking at this with hindsight. At the time of applying they maybe genuinely thought they WERE affected.
He does not need to repay the Grants - if he thought he was entitled at the time then that the end of it. HMRC have not said anything about you doing your Accounts , finding out you have made less or more and based on that you should repay the Grants or claimed. It's nothing to do with the Accountant anyway as it's a business decision .
+1 to all the above. Start by assisting your client to assess each of the rounds in question and you may well find - hard to tell because of the limited info here - that there is no issue of repayment, certainly not in every round.
Agree
For 3
Basically is expected actual turnover expected to be less than prior similar period turnover as a result of covid?
Actual turnover irrelevant, belief at the time not hindsight calculation.
Rules on 1 2 and 3 just so vague
And to repay on basis not being entitled is suggesting your client did not read the claim questions at the time and deliberately made a false claim
Consider also if your opinion turns out to be that client should repay and he takes advice from others who disagree, will he make a claim against PII sometime in the next six years?
Does client agree in writing that he made an incorrect claim?
If so probably not a problem
I don't think its your job to analyse the clients business in this way then sit in judgement of them as though you are a superior being. I said before and I say again it's a business decision not open to audit by you.
I have one on hold on the exact same issue
Not certain
The return, when completed, suggests repayment of SEISS that client was not entitled to.
Yet I really want to suggest that it is a voluntary return of SEISS
There's nothing in the criteria for any of the grants prior to this fifth one that require any comparison with prior periods.
The test was first whether your business was affected by covid, then whether your profits were lower than they would otherwise have been without covid. It is perfectly possible to qualify for all grants while profits go up, because the prior period is irrelevant.