Hi All,
Hope all is well. I am looking into ways to do this! There are 4 companies within a group with a single Shareholder/director as below
Company A - Mr X Shareholder (100%) formed in Jan-21 - £1-1 share
Company B - Mr X Shareholder (100%) formed in Jan-21- £1-1 share
Company C - Mr X Shareholder (100%) formed in Jan-21- £1-1 share
Company D - Mr X Shareholder (100%) formed in Jan-21- £1-1 share
Ideally, Company D will replace as RLE in Co, A,B & C (Parent/Subsidiary set up) and Mr X will remain as the 100% shareholder in Co D. The issue is, Company A, has generated about £40k per month from Management services this year post incoporation, where as Co B and C are still dormant, so share transfers can be done @ £1each. Also Co A has obtained a bank loan for its actual trade to be paid into next year, so what are the implication if we change the structure now?
Question is does it require a valuation of Co A at this point for Co D to be the RLE or can it be back dated effective Jan-21 without trigerring any Tax implication? What I'm thinking is, to value Company A at present, then do a share transfer to Co D which will trigger Capital gains for Mr X and Stamp duty for Company D or we can simply back date this on Companies house now to Jan-21 and Remove Mr X from Co A, B and C and attach Co D to these companies to make Co D Parent?
Not sure if I have explained correctly, but If someone can clarify will be greatful.
Kind regards
MS
Replies (10)
Please login or register to join the discussion.
Also Co A has obtained a bank loan for its actual trade to be paid into next year, so what are the implication if we change the structure now?
Firstly what does "obtained a bank loan for its actual trade to be paid into next year" even mean?
Secondly, you may find a change in the company's ownership is a repayment event for this bank loan. Inserting a parent company with the same ultimate shareholder may not be a 'real change' but legally it is and so may be worth getting the bank's blessing before doing this.
4 companies that are associated, not a group
2 not traded
What is the point of the group
Last time I had a cllient with such grandiose ideas I told her how much the fees were likely to be
She sacked me (more accurately, did not want any work done) but I noticed 3 out of four companies struck off very quickly
So she did follow my advice despite getting no bill for the advice.
You don’t seem to have considered share for exchanges as a way of forming the group, which may well solve all of your tax issues at one fell swoop.
If it is not within your field of expertise, as it wouldn’t be within mine, yes you should seek tax specialist advice on clearances, and on the tax implications of the transactions generally, elsewhere.