Does anyone remember the name of a tax case where a journalist went from being self employed to an employee and successfully claimed that their agents fees were an allowable expense against employment income?
Replies (3)
Please login or register to join the discussion.
No. And it seems a very unlikely decision. It is xifficult to see how the conditions of s336 ITEPA 2003 could possibly have been met, viz
336(1) The general rule is that a deduction from earnings is allowed for an amount if–
(a)the employee is obliged to incur and pay it as holder of the employment, and
(b)the amount is incurred wholly, exclusively and necessarily in the performance of the duties of the employment.
I suspect that the OP may be referring to the Richard and Judy case, but the term "journalists" is then very generous.
http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKSPC/2006/SPC00547.html
In that case ITEPA 2003, s 352 was in point with the term "entertainers" being equally generously applied.