To audit or not audit, is the question

To audit or not audit, is the question

Didn't find your answer?

Are there any circumstances under which an auditor may prepare financial statements to comply with FRS102 and CA2006 from the nominal ledger and trial balance provided by the client, especially as each and every journal entry in the financial statements has to be authorised by management of the company, and the work of the auditor is mechanical? It is a medium size client.

Replies (6)

Please login or register to join the discussion.

RLI
By lionofludesch
06th Aug 2018 22:32

Doubt it.

What's the point of an auditor who relies entirely on management ?

Thanks (0)
By Duggimon
07th Aug 2018 09:28

I'm not sure what the question is here exactly. Is it whether the auditor can trust those figures without auditing further and sign off an audit report? Or whether they can be the ones to turn the ledgers into accounts and also do the audit while maintaining independence?

Thanks (0)
Replying to Duggimon:
avatar
By Fatbrain
07th Aug 2018 12:25

Ethical rules dictate that there could be a threat to independence if the auditor prepares financial statements and then audits them.

Thanks (0)
avatar
By Mike Bath
07th Aug 2018 10:11

Assuming that you're talking about a company that's not part of a listed group, there's nothing to stop an audit firm preparing a set of statutory financial statements from a client's trial balance.

Thanks (1)
Routemaster image
By tom123
07th Aug 2018 16:21

Our company accounts are audited.

We give our final TB to the auditors.

I don't have the software to produce stat accounts in house.

I don't see a problem from an independence perspective.

Thanks (1)
Mike Cooper HJS
By mike_uk_1983
16th Aug 2018 11:42

I carry lots of audits each year and a majority of them we prepare the financial statements from the clients TB.

There is a self review threat for independence but we use different staff on each assignment to cover that.

The only time you cant is when they are listed and the big 4 don't.

Thanks (0)