Hi,
we are environmental consultants and have been asked to do an ecological survey on land in England. The Uk Company we were instructed by is now asking us to invoice another company in the British (well I think the British as there is also American Virgin Islands) Virgin Islands.
Do I charge the Company in Virgin Islands VAT on our services.
I've spent a few hours reading the internet for clues, but not sure I have found the correct answers. Most of what I have read says that as we are making the supply (the survey as I read it) in the UK then I should charge UK VAT.
Has anyone had a similar situation or can help
thanks
Andi
Replies (12)
Please login or register to join the discussion.
Chapter and verse is here: https://www.gov.uk/guidance/vat-place-of-supply-of-services-notice-741a#...
Please discuss with your accountant if you are not clear about this as they will be better placed to advise you...
Even if the rule that services re UK land are supplied in the UK does not apply, cases like that in the link below show the supply will be in the UK:
http://financeandtax.decisions.tribunals.gov.uk/judgmentfiles/j11303/TC0...
Utter rubbish. By default, supplies to a business customer are made where the customer belongs, irrespective of where the work is undertaken. This though would appear to be a land-related service and thus take place where the land is.
Eh? I said more or less above that the normal UK land rule should apply regardless (I am not going to spend time checking exceptions to exceptions etc., so added the above case that puts it beyond doubt in any event as a UK supply to the UK company)! Thus, you are the one talking total cr ap (and you are aptly named!).
[Edit] I note the above case was cited in TJ as confirming who a supply is made to. See:
https://www.taxjournal.com/articles/american-express-services-europe-v-hmrc
Staggering - that someone would even attempt to impute the particular facts of that case into the circumstances, of which we have been given scant information, of the instant query - let alone making the quite absurd statement that it puts the matter beyond doubt.
And in absence of further information I certainly wouldn’t be concluding that the services are land-related.
You've said that "it is land". But "ecological survey" covers a wide variety of activities - what is the precise nature of the survey(s)?
I would say that the stage 1 and stage 2 assessments, and probably knotweed etc, are definitely land-related. The wildlife surveys I'm not so sure about - arguably the land element is incidental.
Surely, the question is WHY were these surveys undertaken. Is the party for whom the surveys looking to purchase a particular piece of land? Or put a particular piece of land to a particular use that necessitates the surveys?
Or are they just generally interested in geological, environmental and ecological issues in a particular are, perhaps as part of some wider research?
I'd say that either the whole thing is land-related or it isn't, because it is less about the what and more about the why.
That does then also take us to the point that Justin was clumsily aiming at; WHO is the true recipient of the supply.