Share this content
23

What the actual [***]?

As above

Didn't find your answer?

Am I the only person who was reading this thread https://www.accountingweb.co.uk/any-answers/implication-of-negative-rese... and found that the replies indent off to the right at a certain point until they CANNOT BE FRIGGING READ?

Seriously Aweb. Just send me a sh1t in the post instead of "improving" the site anymore.

 

Now let me just scroll down and put on some meaningless tags before I post.

Replies (23)

Please login or register to join the discussion.

avatar
By kaff
15th Mar 2017 06:40

Yes, I found that too. Most annoying.

Thanks (0)
By mrme89
15th Mar 2017 06:56

Any thread exceeding ten comments is difficult to follow.

12 months on and there are still no tangible improvements.

At my place of work, serious questions would have been put to the developers months ago. They would have been sacked by now.

Thanks (1)
Replying to mrme89:
By JCresswellTax
15th Mar 2017 09:57

Maybe everyone has been sacked and that is why they never fix these issues, or respond to points raised.

Thanks (1)
Replying to JCresswellTax:
RLI
By lionofludesch
15th Mar 2017 10:02

A genuine possibility.

Thanks (1)
Replying to lionofludesch:
abc
By Kim Jong Un's Hair
15th Mar 2017 10:30

Don't reply any more this subthread will disappear.

Thanks (1)
Replying to Kim Jong Un's Hair:
By Red Leader
15th Mar 2017 12:21

Pardon?

Thanks (0)
Replying to Red Leader:
abc
By Kim Jong Un's Hair
15th Mar 2017 12:41

Keep replying, you'll see.

Thanks (0)
Replying to Kim Jong Un's Hair:
avatar
By sosleepy
15th Mar 2017 13:37

Or maybe he won't see.

Thanks (0)
Replying to sosleepy:
abc
By Kim Jong Un's Hair
15th Mar 2017 15:17

That would be more accurate. We're almost there.

Thanks (0)
avatar
By Chris Mann
15th Mar 2017 10:04

It's like Aweb has the same mindset as HMRC. Utterly and completely baffling.

Since the "reinvention" last May, Aweb is like a market town, that's had a bypass built.

Traffic (members in this case) simply bypass it. The shame is that, although John made a humble apology, at the beginning of the year, it still remains an apology!

Mind, do tell, if anyone knows of an alternative?

Thanks (1)
Replying to Chris Mann:
avatar
By 356B
15th Mar 2017 10:39
Thanks (0)
Replying to 356B:
Danny Kent
By Viciuno
15th Mar 2017 13:32

Shame there isn't a uk only varient, dont know if I could be bothered looking to see which juristriction each question relates to.

Thanks (1)
Replying to Viciuno:
Stepurhan
By stepurhan
15th Mar 2017 14:10

Viciuno wrote:

Shame there isn't a uk only varient, dont know if I could be bothered looking to see which juristriction each question relates to.

I agree. Just glancing through the corporation forum, most queries appeared to have US flags, so the UK content is the exception rather than the norm.

I'd think there would be too much risk of getting wrong jurisdiction answers from a forum like that. A shame.

Thanks (1)
Hallerud at Easter
By DJKL
15th Mar 2017 10:19

Well, despite all the negative press at least MTD has been a real bonus for A Web; without it recent traffic would have been negligible.

Thanks (0)
bike
By FirstTab
15th Mar 2017 10:48

I will go against the the negativity on this thread.

I have my gripes with Sift (censoring of blog click rate drives me nuts! WHY!!) BUT, I think the content on AW is superb. Content, as you know is king.

There is no real alternative. Accountancy Age - YAWN. So damned snotty nosed.

AW is so relevant to my work. A big thank you to all the contributors and the Editorial team.

Thanks (1)
Replying to FirstTab:
By mrme89
15th Mar 2017 11:38

It's the contributors that generate most of the content.

Most of the articles are wishy washy crap that I'd expect to read in the Daily Mail. There's only a small number of articles worth reading, usually the ones by Jennifer Adams or Rebecca Benneyworth.

Thanks (1)
Replying to mrme89:
abc
By Kim Jong Un's Hair
15th Mar 2017 12:04

FT is right. I've been very interested to read about HMRC's expenses audit 5 times in the last three months.

Thanks (0)
Locutus of Borg
By Locutus
15th Mar 2017 11:25

Another annoying thing about threads (particularly long ones) is the notifications. Under the old site, I used to quite like receiving an e-mail notifying me of the postings that occurred over the past hour.

Instead, when you select "hourly update" with the current site, you get a semi-random dribble of postings over the previous few days.

For instance, from the thread in question at 10:50am on 15/03/2017, I received notification of Basil's post from the day before 14/03/2017 13:01

Then 10 minutes later, I received notification of Lion's response to Basil dated 14/03/2017 13:33.

How hard is it to get something like that right?

Thanks (1)
avatar
By sosleepy
15th Mar 2017 11:58

It also seems that the occasional update from Ben Smith has been abandoned as a meaningless exercise.

Since John admitted at Xmas that the new site is pants there's been nothing in terms of improvements or changes or even vague information.

Thanks (0)
Replying to sosleepy:
Hallerud at Easter
By DJKL
15th Mar 2017 12:36

Well, one thing I have noticed is that all the posts over 7 in a thread now seem to display without needing to click the box at the foot each time. Now have not checked if this only applies if I have already visited the thread or if it applies re all threads.

Still think navigation buttons re say page 2, page 3 and last post should be at both top and bottom of each thread page.

Thanks (0)
Replying to DJKL:
avatar
By sosleepy
15th Mar 2017 13:21

I still get the 'show all replies' button

Edit: Seems you were right. Don't seem to have to click it again when I revisit the thread. So a slight improvement. Three cheers for Sift!

Thanks (0)
avatar
By Chris Mann
15th Mar 2017 15:00

Strange coincidence -King Jong posts a reasonable comment, members extend on the theme and, hey ho, there's another "modification" to the site?

Do Aweb seriously takes us all for complete *****?

Thanks (0)
Replying to Chris Mann:
By mrme89
15th Mar 2017 15:40

[quote=Chris Mann

Do Aweb seriously takes us all for complete *****?

[/quote]

Yes.

Thanks (0)
Share this content