INTM334580, which we have previously noted is a good easy check of who gets PA and who doesn't, says this about N&R's of Argentian and Korea:
"no relief for 2002-03 and later years"
Does this mean no PA for them since then, or does it mean something else?
What did they do wrong?!
Replies (3)
Please login or register to join the discussion.
No idea ... presumably you ask just out of idle interest?
FWIW in 2001 Argentina underwent a full-blown debt default crisis, which in turn led to an Emergency Taxes regime by the then administration in 2002-03.
I can't be bothered to do the research for you, but I suspect there was something equally cataclysmic in Korea (I recall something about President Bush saying they were part of the axis of evil)?
BTW, why aren't you interested in the qualification "Sweden(up to April 2016 only)"?
Is INTM334580 correct though?
These restrictions are not mentioned in RDRM10340 or HMRC's tax digest, and the UK's treaties with both countries do seem to have non-discrimination clauses in their (1996) treaties that do afford personal allowances to individuals who are both nationals and residents.
INTM334580 does agree with the tax digest and treaty for Sweden though, whilst RDRM10340 doesn't mention the 2016 change for the new treaty.
Nationals of Sweden get a PA by reason of being EEA nationals, but individuals resident in Sweden who are not Swedish nationals do not.
The tax digest is here:
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploa...
The treaty with South Korea is here:
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploa...
There doesn't seem to be a treaty with North Korea, but I can't think why.