Save content
Have you found this content useful? Use the button above to save it to your profile.
Whistle blower

Accounting dilemmas: Trustees and whistleblowing

8th Aug 2019
Save content
Have you found this content useful? Use the button above to save it to your profile.

What should you consider if you discover that your organisation’s trustees are unaware of a fraud investigation? AAT’s head of professional standards Adam Williamson provides tips on how to deal with unethical practice.

As many finance professionals are well aware, fraud is not as uncommon as we’d like to think, and organisations don’t always have clear guidelines on how they will tackle such situations of wrongdoing from their own employees.

Whistleblowing policies are supposed to help uncover certain fraudulent scenarios, but even when this has been followed, does every stakeholder need to be made aware? Consider the situation below:

The scenario

You work in the finance team of a charity. One of the directors is being investigated for fraud involving the reselling of IT equipment and personal use of a company credit card.

It has come to your attention that the trustees of the charity have not been made aware of this.

After the initial issues came to light, the charity immediately implemented a whistleblowing policy which required incidents to be reported to the chair and deputy chair of the board.

However, the director general subsequently advised all staff that this particular matter should not be discussed with trustees.

What do you need to consider, and what action do you need to take in this scenario?

Considerations and actions

Firstly, you’ll need to consider why exactly the director general decided to advise staff in this way. You should enquire directly in writing on this, asking the director general to set out reasons why staff have been instructed to disregard the whistleblowing policy.

Bear in mind, of course, there may well be legitimate reasons for his advice. For example, it may be in connection with the police investigation into the fraud, other legal proceedings, or indeed any internal investigations.

However, if the director general does not provide any acceptable reasons, then go ahead and follow the whistleblowing policy.

There are two areas of AAT’s own code of professional ethics that this particular example relates to. Namely, these are:

  • The principle of objectivity, where accountants are obliged not to compromise their professional or business judgment because of bias, conflict of interest or the undue influence of others
  • Confidentiality. There are some situations where the law legally allows a breach of the duty of keeping information confidential. This would clearly be an example of where a disclosure can be necessary.

The accounting profession has countless examples where accountants are challenged by unethical or even illegal behaviour and ethical compliance – such as demonstrated in this example – helps to correctly tackle such issues.

Replies (0)

Please login or register to join the discussion.

There are currently no replies, be the first to post a reply.