Save content
Have you found this content useful? Use the button above to save it to your profile.
Royal golden crown with jewels on pillow AccountingWEB Audit reform left out of King's speech

Audit reforms left out of King’s speech


The omission of audit reform from today’s King’s speech has been met with disappointment from across the accounting profession. 

7th Nov 2023
Save content
Have you found this content useful? Use the button above to save it to your profile.

The King’s speech today included 21 pieces of legislation that are set to shape the prime minister’s pre-election plans, but what wasn’t prioritised in that primary legislation was the audit and corporate governance reform bill.

The plans to overhaul audit have been waiting on the sidelines for some time after the high-profile collapses of Carillion, BHS and Thomas Cook exposed the audit failings of Big Four firms. 

The omission of the audit shake-up from today’s King’s speech pushes any efforts to reform the audit until after the next general election. The government has committed to bringing forward the legislation when “parliamentary time allows”, but with no timetable in place, the momentum is taken out of key proposals such as the new enhanced Audit, Reporting and Governance Authority (ARGA) regulator.

ARGA on the sidelines

With the legislation to create ARGA missing from the King’s speech, the Financial Reporting Council (FRC) commented after the announcement that it will “utilise its current regulatory toolkit” to support UK businesses and promote UK corporate growth and competitiveness. 

The regulator used the omission to update on a recent consultation with stakeholders on revisions to the UK corporate governance code. The FRC confirmed that it will only take forward a small “focused number of proposals ”out of the 18 proposals that it set out in the consultation and it will stop the development of the remainder. 

These changes include strengthening corporate governance outcomes, improving internal controls and reducing reporting burden and duplication. 

This means over half of the proposals are left on the chopping block, including those relating to the role of audit committees on environmental and social governance and modifications to existing code provisions around diversity, overboarding and committee chairs engaging with shareholders. 

Lack of political will

The exclusion of audit reform was met with disappointment from across the accounting profession, with professional bodies urging the government to reconsider its decision. 

Michael Izza, ICAEW’s chief executive, said the government’s promise of comprehensive reform remains “unfulfilled due to a lack of political will”.

He went on to express his disappointment about the audit and corporate governance bill being missing from the King’s speech, which he said leaves “no realistic prospect that this key piece of primary legislation will happen before the next election”. 

“This comes hard on the heels of the government’s surprise decision last month to scrap new draft reporting regulations that the regulator and the accountancy profession had been working on for years.

“The attractiveness of the UK as a place to invest and do business is firmly based on the high quality of corporate transparency, governance, reporting and audit in this country. The government’s faint-hearted attitude to protecting and maintaining that reputation does the economy no favours.”

This sentiment was echoed by Bruce Cartwright, the CEO of the Institute of Chartered Accountants of Scotland (ICAS). “This feels like groundhog day,” he said.  “Again, we see lack of action by a government apparently committed to reform but again backtracking on those commitments. The result is to potentially undermine public trust in that as a business community, we demonstrate transparency in business and do the right thing.”

He added that the omission is a “huge blow” to the interests of UK businesses and the public and noted that it comes shortly after the government pulled its draft regulations to enhance the UK’s corporate reporting framework in October. 

“There is consensus among all the key players that these reforms are long overdue. UK businesses need a solid, regulatory environment to ensure good governance and to maintain the public’s trust,” said Cartwright.  “Audit and corporate governance reform can’t wait until after the next general election.”

Audit reforms

Plans to reform audit have been in the works since Carillion collapsed six years ago. The government set out its plans to restore trust in the audit regime in May 2022 following a consultation, noting that the reforms would “ensure the UK sets a global standard”. 

The reforms included the creation of ARGA, and a new threshold for public entities which would bring only 600 more companies under regulatory scrutiny.

However, the reforms were branded a “missed opportunity” by commentators for not introducing a version of the Sarbanes-Oxley reporting regime and there were complaints that the plans were moving at a “glacial pace”.

The exclusion of audit reform from the King’s speech was expected, after plans were leaked in early September


Replies (6)

Please login or register to join the discussion.

By johnjenkins
09th Nov 2023 10:14

How do you reform an audit????????????????? You can improve the way an audit is conducted but you can't reform it and I think that is why it was left out of the King's speech.

Thanks (0)
By Jack the Lad
09th Nov 2023 11:53

Surely it is down to the accountancy bodies to "reform audits" not the Government? As I mention in my separate post regarding the PWC fine of £4.5M and other large fines imposed upon the large firms, they appear to have lost the ability to apply forensic techniques, which came with my in depth small firm training, but does not appear to be included by the big firms.

Thanks (0)
By Wiganer Elaine
09th Nov 2023 13:18

The only way to improve audits is to have an independent auditing body that will appoint and pay the auditors.

Starting with public companies - the companies pay the auditing body a fee dependant on turnover/value of company. The auditing body appoints the registered auditor to carry out the audit and pays said auditor.

Said auditor is not reliant on the company it is auditing for its fee - it answers to the auditing body - if there are issues re the signing off of the accounts, this is between the company and the auditing body and the audit fee is not withheld by the company.

The audit arms of accountants are independent of the advisory/tax consultancy work.

Thanks (2)
Replying to Wiganer Elaine:
By johnjenkins
09th Nov 2023 13:33

Very good idea but it will push the cost of auditing sky high.

Thanks (0)
Replying to johnjenkins:
By Wiganer Elaine
09th Nov 2023 14:36

Audit fees for plcs may go higher but at least anyone investing in those companies will have some assurance that the accounts are accurate representations of the business.

As long as companies appoint their own auditors there is always a risk that "bought and paid for" auditors will let something slide in order to protect their fee and keep the audit.

Every year a different auditor would be appointed by the auditing body so there would be no "looking at last year's file" and just repeating work with little thought!

Each PLC audit would be truly independent and impartial!

Thanks (0)
Replying to Wiganer Elaine:
By johnjenkins
09th Nov 2023 15:30

Now who would make up the auditing body?

Thanks (0)