Employment Status & IR35 expert Re Legal Consulting Ltd
Share this content

Hermes’ new ‘self-employed plus’ deal: Don’t call it a new status

6th Feb 2019
Employment Status & IR35 expert Re Legal Consulting Ltd
Share this content
hermes courier

Rebecca Seeley Harris examines the implications of the new ‘self-employed plus’ contract agreed by courier company Hermes and asks how such a deal might interact with the UK tax system.

The GMB union and courier firm Hermes have negotiated a deal that will give couriers the right to opt into a “self-employed plus” contract. This will give them 28 days’ paid holiday annually, or the equivalent if they work part-time, and guaranteed pay equal to £8.55 per hour. If the courier opts in and joins the GMB they will also get union representation.

The negotiations were entered into as a result of 194 Hermes couriers being granted status as a so-called limb ‘b’ worker at the employment tribunal in June 2018. As a result, these couriers were given basic employment rights such as entitlement to paid holiday and national minimum wage but, these rights do not extend automatically to the entire workforce. So, the remainder of the 15,000 Hermes couriers did not benefit from the tribunal ruling until now.

The guaranteed wage of £8.55 per hour is above the current National Living Wage (NLW) minimum of £7.83 per hour, which rises to £8.21 per hour from April 2019. For those couriers who do not opt-in, there is no change, but Hermes report that these couriers will earn premium rates as they have done for the past 20 years.

What remains unclear is that although these individuals or ‘workers’ now get basic employment rights, they still pay tax as if they are self-employed. This is because in the tax system there are only two categories: employed or self-employed. However, for employment rights, there are three categories: employed, self-employed and worker.

Whether the courier is employed or self-employed for tax purposes is decided by employment status case law and neither the employment tribunal ruling nor the GMB collective agreement have any bearing on the status for tax purposes, as the two are not connected. However, in employment rights cases such as the recent Pimlico Plumbers case in the Supreme court, it is a lower threshold to prove worker status than employee status for tax purposes.

This now creates a workforce where apparently there are some genuinely self-employed couriers doing the same job as these new ‘self-employed plus’ workers with basic employment rights and union representation but no real difference in the way that they work.

It has been reported that the self-employed plus couriers will come under more control from Hermes, for example having to follow specified routes, but this has been denied by Hermes. As the workers themselves are all still paying tax as self-employed, this also means that Hermes is not making national insurance contributions on their behalf.

This issue was looked at by the Office of Tax Simplification (OTS) in the Employment Status Report [2015]. The OTS also made a recommendation that a cross-government working group be set up on employment status for the different departments to consider their relative positions, especially the mismatch in the system between employment status for employment rights and tax purposes. The group was formed in 2016, but put on hold pending the conclusions of the Taylor Review and does not appear to have been reformed subsequently.

Despite this, there is as yet no resolution to this conundrum. Until the system changes, those individuals who are granted status as a limb ‘b’ worker through the tribunals or by negotiation are still likely to pay tax as self-employed and gig economy firms will not be paying national insurance contributions. If I was HMRC, I would be taking a closer look at this situation.

Replies (1)

Please login or register to join the discussion.

By Robbo
07th Feb 2019 10:50

This will no doubt be used as an excuse by government to increase class2 contributions to the genuine self employed risk taking entrepreneurs as well as those gaming the system.

Thanks (0)