Replies (21)
Please login or register to join the discussion.
“We believe this claim is without merit and we will robustly defend the case. Responsibility for the failure of Carillion lies solely with the company’s board and management, who set the strategy and ran the business.”
Well, they would say that, wouldn't they?
It's interesting that it's The Official Receiver suing. That must be a bit worrying if you're a KPMG partner. I wonder how much they'll provide in their accounts for this and restrict drawings etc.
I'm very much looking forward to seeing this one play out.
And you don't see a 'story', Richard, that draws from both your KPMG article of 2 days ago ("KPMG partners bank £688,000 payday") and the above?
Not just a passing mention in the final sentence, but some serious 'join the dots' analysis?
It doesn't have to be libellous or a pure opinion piece; but stating facts and asking pointed questions is what I might've expected ... without having to wait for P Eye.
In the wreckage of Carillion, the government has announced major audit reforms to “restore business confidence” and to break up the stranglehold the Big Four has over the market.
Doesnt this just join the long list of reforms? It is clear that big business bamboozles the regulator and that the RSB's who are tasked with maintining standards are simply mere proxies with quasi-legal status.
Or, alternatively one Partner has been bamboozled and lead a once venerable Accounting firm into an Andersen scale collapse.
The story has different players, an yet the stage play is a repeat.
These audit companies IMHO, talk the talk, especially KPMG with ESG etc, yet ultimately scam stakeholders, and take a large part of the pie for doing a poor job.
I smile when I hear of these fines. As an unqualified accountant, who has been trading for over 40 years, I still have problems with some Banks and Building Societies in completing references for long term clients. Often they will not accept them because I am unqualified. However, they appear to be quite happy to accept them from the bid 4 who keep getting fined for what appears poor workmanship.
Once upon time it was the 'big' 6 before PW and Coopers merged. Since they seem to hoover up most of the work despite being smaller in number, I don't think 'big' is useful any more.
The 'Gigantic 4'? 'The F*ing Enormous 3'?
Big 8 in my day. (mid 80s)
Price Waterhouse
Arthur Anderson
Arthur Young
Peat Marwick
Ernst & Whinney
Deloitte, Haskins and Sells
Coopers Lybrand
Touche Ross
Hahahaha, I wonder what their spokesman will say if they lose. By now they should have a good bank of excuses.
Hahahaha, I wonder what their spokesman will say if they lose. By now they should have a good bank of excuses.
Hahahaha, I wonder what their spokesman will say if they lose. By now they should have a good bank of excuses.
I've just re-read "The Smartest Guys in the Room" - the detailed story of the rise and fall of Enron, which also took Arthur Anderson down with it.
The title by the way is ironic - a business top heavy with MBA's who it turned out couldn't run a proverbial whelk stall. Or if they did they would post 10 years projected sales of whelks as income on day one, and then borrow money on a friends credit card, secured on shares in the whelk stall, (off-balance sheet you see) to provide the actual cash to fund the huge bonuses they would then pay themselves.
All signed off by an auditor too close to the client and apparently unwilling or unable to understand the connection between profit and cash.
Don't be silly ... the lawyers have to make a profit!
Although some of us may have some schadenfreude over KPMG, this is bad news for all of us - it tarnishes the reputation of our profession and will result in increased regulation and increased costs.
Remember, too, that there are many honest current and former staff at KPMG whose CV will similarly be damaged by association.
Remember, too, that there are many honest current and former staff at KPMG whose CV will similarly be damaged by association.
It's probably competence, rather than honesty, which is in question.
'The Official Receiver is suing KPMG for failing in its role as the auditor of Carillion and is seeking damages of more than £1bn '
Blimey the official receiver has gone from timid [***] cat to man eating lion in a very short space of time, I think we had all better watch out.