Open Banking: Can banking’s technological laggards meet the challenge?
You might also be interested in
Replies (3)
Please login or register to join the discussion.
Is this is a paid advertorial for Starling Bank? It certainly reads like one and I would take considerable issue with many of the assertions in it. For example, TSB is a challenger bank, not an incumbent. It was moving off some old but very sophisticated systems of Lloyds onto newer systems but with thinner product functionality. Sabadell and challengers generally (although I do not know whether Starling has done this) have either bought package core banking platforms or taken the source code of one and adapted it in-house. This is a recipe for simplistic products and it is difficult to acquire a book of business from an incumbent onto such an architecture without going backwards in terms of product sophistication. Having mobile and internet access is not good enough: there needs to be substance in the products as well.
Hey boblyddon,
Sorry the article didn't meet your expectation. No, it's not paid advertorial. It's very easy to sound overly positive when you're talking to a single interviewee about the progress of their business. On top of that, there's no annual reports available and they were quite limited on the financial information they would share.
I'll make sure I'm tougher with my interview questions in the future.
Sterling built their infrastructure in-house. I assumed they did this from scratch but I'm happy to ask them a specific question if it's of interest?
Thanks,
Chris
I thought open banking would at last prompt Lloyds to set up a partner feed into Xero (and no doubt other cloud accounting packages) but here we are four months later and still no sign of it....
Cheers
Tim