FRS 102 and goodwill amortisation

Kashflow logo
Share this content

With a reduction in the presumed life of goodwill from 20 to five years under the new reporting standard FRS 102, many accountants are concerned about how goodwill is to be written off. This short overview from Steve Collings clarifies some of the some ambiguities.

There are some notable differences between the way in which goodwill (and other intangible assets) are accounted for in FRS 102 ‘The Financial Reporting Standard applicable in the UK and Republic of Ireland’, which comes into effect for accounting periods commencing on or after 1 January 2015, and that of existing UK GAAP.

Many clients will have goodwill on their balance sheet that has been accounted for under the provisions in FRS 10 ‘Goodwill and intangible assets’ and this short article aims to clear up some of the most commonly asked questions where accounting treatments are markedly different in FRS 102 with an emphasis placed on the value, and amortisation period, to be used on transition to FRS 102.

Please note that this article does not consider any tax reliefs associated with goodwill amortisation. HMRC have issued an Overview Paper for FRS 102 which may be a useful guide for those wanting an idea of the tax impact of FRS 102.

FRS 10 treatment

FRS 10 at paragraph 19 includes a rebuttable presumption that the useful life of purchased goodwill may be assessed to be more than 20 years (or indefinite) only if...

Please Login or Register to read the full article

The full article is available to registered AccountingWEB.co.uk members only. To read the rest of this article you’ll need to login or register. Registration is FREE and allows you to view all content, ask questions, comment and much more.

About Steven Collings

collings

Steve Collings, FMAAT FCCA is the audit and technical partner at Leavitt Walmsley Associates Ltd where Steve trained and qualified.

Replies

Please login or register to join the discussion.

avatar
18th Jun 2014 23:34

infinite or indefinite

Is the author confusing the two? I can't imagine any circumstances where the life of an intangible asset could be considered to be "infinite". Plenty, however, where the life is "indefinite".

Thanks (0)
19th Jun 2014 16:16

Lax Accounting

It seems pretty clear to me that the goal is to get organizations to put a little work into providing the usefulness of the asset...rather than just giving everyone a 20 year pass. It changes nothing, unless you are unwilling to provide the detail required, which is what they are hoping a percentage of corporations will do. When we do accounts payable audits, we see the result of lax accounting every day.

Thanks (0)