Many companies receive grants for all sorts of different things, for example when a company wants to expand and set up in a deprived area, the company may receive a grant from the government to entice it to create employment opportunities, explains Steve Collings.
This article will consider the accounting for government grants in light of some ambiguities that have cropped up for some practitioners.
Government grants – overall principles
Government grants are covered by SSAP 4 Accounting for Government Grants. This is a fairly old standard, issued in April 1974 and revised in July 1990 following the issue of ED 43 in 1988 whose proposals it broadly adopted. SSAP 4 recognises that the term “government” is widely defined and as a consequence does not just include the national government as we know it, but its scope extends to government agencies and non-departmental public bodies. In addition, its scope also covers the EC and other EC bodies, together with other international bodies and agencies.
The FRSSE (effective April 2008) also deals with government grants within the Fixed assets and goodwill section at section 6.
There are generally two forms of grant which need accounting consideration:
- Revenue based grants
- Capital based grants
As accountants, we are all familiar with the principles of the matching concept. SSAP 4 states that government grants need to be recognised in the profit and loss account so as to match them with the expenditure towards which they are intended to contribute. For revenue based grants, these will be written off to the P&L account as and when the relevant expenditure has been incurred; for capital based grants the grant will be recognised in the profit and loss account over the life of the asset to which it relates (i.e. matched with the relevant depreciation charges).
An important point to note is that when a client receives a government grant, it cannot be recognised in the profit and loss account until the conditions for the grant’s receipt have been complied with, and there is reasonable assurance that the grant will be received. If a client does not comply with the conditions of the grant’s terms, then the grant-making body will more than likely have the right to recover all, or part, of the grant. To accord with the prudence concept, clients and their accountants need to understand that just because there is a possibility that a grant may have to be repaid at some point in the future, this “possibility” cannot mean indefinite deferral from the profit and loss account. Clients and accountants need to consider if there is a likelihood that any breach of the grant’s terms will occur (or already has occurred) and if this is the case, or is likely to be the case, then provision should be made for the liability.
SSAP 4 recognises that the tax treatment of different types of grant can be polarised. At one end of the spectrum, some grants may be totally free of any tax consequences, whereas at the other end of the spectrum, some grants are taxed as income on receipt.
Many accountants may well consider that if a grant is taxable on receipt, the entire grant should be credited to the profit and loss account on receipt (i.e. accounting treatment to follow the tax treatment). SSAP 4 does not take this view; instead SSAP 4 recognises that the tax treatment of a grant cannot determine the accounting treatment of the grant. SSAP 4 concludes that if accountants simply follow the tax treatment and write off the whole grant to the profit and loss account, there are occasions when doing so will result in an “unacceptable departure from the principle that government grants should be matched with the expenditure to which they are intended to contribute” [SSAP 4 paragraph 7]. Care should be taken to ensure that any credits of grants to the profit and loss account are done in the correct accounting period. Where timing differences do occur between a tax charge and the recognition of the related credit of the grant in the profit and loss account this will trigger deferred tax issues and therefore the provisions in FRS 19 Deferred Tax will need consideration.
Register for free with AccountingWEB and log in to see the full article, which also covers:
- Accounting treatments and examples
- Revenue based grants
Steve Collings is audit and technical partner at Leavitt Walmsley Associates and the author of ‘Interpretation and Application of International Standards on Auditing’. He is also the author of ‘The AccountingWEB Guide to IFRS’ and ‘IFRS For Dummies’ and was named Accounting Technician of the Year at the 2011 British Accountancy Awards.
About Steven Collings
Steve Collings, FMAAT FCCA is the audit and technical partner at Leavitt Walmsley Associates Ltd where Steve trained and qualified.