Save content
Have you found this content useful? Use the button above to save it to your profile.
Rolls-Royce Regional Customer Training Center

KPMG fined over £3m for Rolls-Royce audit failings


In the latest of a series of failings, KPMG has been fined £3.375m and severely reprimanded by the Financial Reporting Council over the audit of aerospace manufacturer Rolls-Royce.


24th May 2022
Save content
Have you found this content useful? Use the button above to save it to your profile.

In a case that centred on KPMG’s knowledge of Rolls-Royce’s “bribery payments” to land contracts in India, accounting regulator the Financial Reporting Council (FRC) sanctioned the Big Four firm over the audit of the aircraft manufacturer for the 2010 financial year. 

Anthony Sykes, who was KPMG’s statutory auditor for Rolls-Royce from 2008 to 2012 and signed the report, was also hit with a £150,000 fine (adjusted to £112,500 for admissions) and severely reprimanded. 

In addition to the financial penalty, KPMG will also pay executive counsel’s costs of the investigation of £726,000.

The fine, which was reduced from £4.5m to £3.375m due to early payment, is the latest in a litany of penalties against the Big Four firm and comes only a week after KPMG received a £14m fine for misleading the FRC over the audit of collapsed outsourcer Carillion

Jon Holt, chief executive of KPMG in the UK, said: “When I came into my role as chief executive, I said that we would move swiftly to resolve and learn from our outstanding regulatory cases. I am pleased we have now concluded this historic matter and I’m sorry that elements of our work in the FY2010 audit of Rolls-Royce Group plc did not meet the professional standards required.   

“In addition to resolving legacy cases, we are also investing significantly in training, controls and technology to improve quality and resilience in our audit practice.”  

Issue with intermediaries

KPMG’s audit failings at the aerospace company centred on two sets of payments made by Rolls-Royce to agents in India, amid allegations of bribery and corruption. This resulted in Rolls-Royce paying millions to settle US and UK criminal investigations resulting from the use of intermediaries.

At the time of the 2010 audit, the FRC said that KPMG was aware of the allegations of bribery and malpractice through the use of intermediaries and “advisers” in the defence field and were aware of the matters as the auditor of another defence company. 

The timeline set out by the FRC outlined that in May 2010 the Rolls-Royce ethics committee considered the findings of an investigation into the use by the company of agents in India when the use of intermediaries in connection with Indian Government defence contracts was restricted by the Indian authorities.

However, the FRC said that KPMG was aware by 11 June 2010 that there might have been an issue with Rolls-Royce and an agent in India, which didn’t comply with the legislation. Less than a month later, the Big Four firm knew that there had been two payments to an Indian agent: one of £3.32m and another in 2006 of £1.85m to secure the return of a list of agents that had been taken from Rolls-Royce’s Indian branch office. 

Rolls-Royce’s conduct became the subject of a Serious Fraud Investigation and in 2017 the aerospace company entered a deferred prosecution agreement with the SFO and paid £497.25m.

Failure to exercise professional scepticism

KPMG accepted that it failed to include a summary of the “Indian Issues” and the results of their discussions with management and others in the audit documentation. 

This, the regulator ruled, amounted to serious failures to exercise professional scepticism, to obtain sufficient, appropriate audit evidence and document this on the audit file, and to achieve sufficient engagement quality control.

However, the FRC notes that it is not alleged that the failings in question caused any misstatement in the FY2010 financial statements to go undetected.

At the time of the audit KPMG charged an audit fee of £431m. It audited Rolls-Royce from 1990 to 2017.

Claudia Mortimore, deputy executive counsel to the FRC, said: “It is essential that auditors are alive to the risks of companies’ non-compliance with laws and regulations, and conduct work in this area with care and sufficient professional scepticism. This is particularly so when the audited entity is in a sector where such risks are known to be prevalent.”

Replies (12)

Please login or register to join the discussion.

By Justin Bryant
24th May 2022 09:38

Investigating the Big 4 accountancy firms over major audit failings has to be one of the most secure (and lucrative) jobs going surely (and is not particularly difficult either given the obviousness and magnitude of these failings - a bit like shooting very large, immobile fish in a barrel)? Where and how do I apply?

Thanks (9)
By Hugo Fair
24th May 2022 10:02

How many 'severe reprimands' does it take before the beast even notices?
I have visions of cavemen throwing puny sticks at an oversized rhinoceros in the hope that, one day, one of the sticks will inflict even a surface scratch.

And I love that Jon Holt can get away with the time-honoured 'apology' that start with "In addition to resolving legacy cases .."
They are all 'legacy cases' simply because it takes so long to bring them to any conclusion!

Thanks (3)
By JustAnotherUser
24th May 2022 10:13

'Fined' I'm sure they just factor these into overheads and the cost of doing business.

Hopefully I have this right....

...charged an audit fee of £431m. It audited Rolls-Royce from 1990 to 2017. (16m as year)...

Fined 3m or £125k per year.

Fined an average of 0.78% of the fees.


Thanks (7)
By Hometing
24th May 2022 13:08

"ah s***, here we go again"

Thanks (3)
By Ben Alligin
25th May 2022 11:14

Great news, but why is my ICAEW annual subscription fee not going down?!

Thanks (0)
25th May 2022 11:21

KPMG don't seem very good at auditing do they?

Thanks (3)
By philaccountant
25th May 2022 11:22

Global revenues of $32b, roughly £26b.
Fine of £3.375m.

I make that 69 minutes of annual turnover. I'm sure that will discourage future malfeasance.

Thanks (3)
By Marlinman
25th May 2022 11:41

Hahahahaha. Yet again.

Thanks (1)
By Mr J Andrews
25th May 2022 12:51

No doubt this four letter word Practice has annual & sizeable Specific Reserves in its Balance Sheet, anticipating such ongoing series of failings.
Coupled with the Double Entry bookeeping for fee hikes.

Thanks (0)
By Paul Crowley
01st Apr 2023 14:31

This is trending?
With a 2017 Article on Charity chart of accounts?
Can I get an article to trend all on my own?

Thanks (0)
Replying to Paul Crowley:
By Hugo Fair
01st Apr 2023 15:11

Quite probably.
I've never had the patience to test it out (presumably opening & closing a thread a clot of times in quick succession)?

The same happens in the 'Trending' section of Any Answers - where the same boring question about Accountancy Manager reappears nearly EVERY weekend!

Thanks (1)
Replying to Hugo Fair:
By Hugo Fair
02nd Apr 2023 00:50

I see the same old boring thread has indeed been 'promoted' once again to its regular weekend spot as 'Trending' within Any Answers ...
... "Has anyone taken plunge with AccountancyManager "4th Oct 2017

If it's a software bug it's both weird & ridiculous; if it's an example of deliberate human manipulation then Aweb should stop it pronto!

Thanks (1)