Don't blame the British Business Bank

british business bank logo
british_business_bank
Adam Tavener
Chairman
Clifton Asset Management
Columnist
Share this content

Adam Tavener takes a recent report on mainstream banks to task and argues that it is a gross oversimplification to suggest that the creation of a national investment bank will solve our productivity issues.

A recent report by think tank Civitas covered the usual ground with respect to the availability of finance to the UK’s SMEs and encouraged the creation of a new national investment bank to replace the existing British Business Bank (BBB), for whom it had few kind words.

As a surprise to me, the report cites the ‘market failure’ of the mainstream banking sector as being the source of our worryingly low productivity, and strongly states that the BBB is ‘not fit for purpose’.

I have to disagree – you simply can’t draw a direct causal link between productivity and the ease of obtaining credit.

Yes, to an extent a business may have to borrow to invest - typically in better technology - but, if the business is creditworthy most of this type of equipment comes with some sort of vendor finance package as standard, so the need to approach a reluctant bank is rare.

If, of course, the business isn’t particularly creditworthy then access to more credit is moot, as more fundamental questions need asking. Either way, I think it is a gross oversimplification to suggest that the creation of a national investment bank will solve our productivity issues.

That said, there is no question that ten years of bank retrenchment did hurt some small business. This was a market failure and the creation of the BBB was part of the government response to this, as was the creation of the mandatory bank referral scheme.

It is my opinion that the way BBB has chosen to distribute its funding, through pari passu arrangements with existing non-bank lenders, thus increasing market liquidity at minimal risk to taxpayer funds, is both sensible and commercially sound, which is why it returns a profit. To generate a profit whilst facilitating an extra £4bn of SME finance is quite a long way from ‘not fit for purpose’.

The report suggests that there remains a shortage of available funding for small business. Tosh. The SME lending marketplace is currently awash with non-bank lenders all trying desperately to get funds out of the door and to work in the marketplace.

The real market failure is simply the lack of awareness that (still) a depressingly large proportion of would-be SME borrowers have to what their real alternatives are. This is where accountants and other business advisers could really play an important role.

For instance, it is surely far better to address this issue by ramping up the understanding of, and adoption of, the existing bank referral legislation amongst both SMEs and their advisers than it is to introduce yet another lender into an already saturated marketplace.

The Civitas report holds up the German KfW state-owned investment bank as a good example that the UK should follow. Maybe, but on closer inspection, KfW was established in 1948 as part of the Marshall Plan, and there is no doubt that it was successful. But, when you are starting with such a low bar and an effectively clean sheet of paper, pretty much any progress looks like a success.

So KfW is 70 years old this year. According to the last figures that I could find its SME lending division provided €20bn (£15bn) of funding in 2015. Set that against a typical year’s UK SME finance provision in excess of £150bn and it doesn’t feel like that big a deal. Useful, yes, but not a game-changer, especially after seventy years on the job.

Their chosen method of distributing loan funds is very similar to BBB as well. Essentially, they use the main banks as their distributors, as opposed to the BBB focussing on non-bank lenders, but the risk sharing and commercial underwriting processes are the same. However, KfW does provide up to 80% of the funding requirement as opposed to 50% over here. Based on the similarity of model one could reasonably predict that BBB would be facilitating far more than an inflation-adjusted £15bn in 60 odd years’ time.

If Civitas really want to resolve the current market imperfections they should get behind the programme that is already in place and shout very loudly that there are already many really good non-bank financing providers just waiting to fund SMEs, and it’s now up to the government, the big banks, and all advisers (not just accountants!) to the small business community to make sure that business owners understand and are aware of these options.

This shift will drive a healthy marketplace, increase competition and, based on their premise, not mine, help improve productivity. That’s got to be better than yet another quasi-governmental entrant into the SME lending space.

About Adam Tavener

Adam is founder and chairman of Clifton Asset Management Plc, the innovators behind the designated business funding comparison platform Alternative Business Funding, providing high quality finance to SMEs across the UK. Adam hosts ‘Tav on Money’ a regular series of video opinions on YouTube.’

Replies

Please login or register to join the discussion.

23rd Mar 2018 14:23

I fully agree with Adam, you only have to look over the accounts of RBS so see how a more relaxed approach to lending quickly turns into very significant losses.

For me the by far and away the biggest issue for the economy are the skills levels of the pool of workers available to recruit from and the attitude that our education system seems to induct in them. Work life balance seems on the lips of fresh graduates and basic numeracy is sadly missing from school leavers, and the list goes on and on...

Thanks (0)
avatar
28th Apr 2018 07:45

I am agree with you. Thanks for sharing.

Thanks (0)