ICAEW wants extension of legal services licence for chartered accountants

Share this content

The ICAEW has suggested that its members should be allowed to provide tax-based legal services.

In a consultation, the ICAEW said that allowing accounting firms to offer probate services had been so successful that it’s consulting on extending regulated services that they can provide.

If the proposal is approved it would mean chartered accountants would be able to able to compete with solicitors for tax services including conducting litigation, having rights of audience and being able to offer notarial and reserved instrument services. They would also be able to administer oaths.

Research has shown tax-based legal services “will be an adjunct to our members’ taxation services” and also personal wealth and financial planning services, the ICAEW said.

In 2014, the Institute started to regulate and licence probate services. The change was allowed by the Legal Services Act 2007 which was designed to increase competition in legal services.

The ICAEW said that the number of accountants that had applied for a licence to do probate services had “far exceeded” its expectations.

Peter James, the ICAEW's head of regulatory policy, told AccountingWEB that the ICAEW had licensed 180 accounting firms for probate work. 

Any extension of legal services accountants can provide will face opposition from solicitors.

Jonathan Smithers, president of the Law Society, a professional body which represents about 150,000 solicitors in England and Wales, told AccountingWEB that although accountants provide valuable tax advisory services it was concerned that extending reserved tax-based legal services could "put consumers at risk" and would not be in the public interest.  

"Litigation is a specialist area in itself, and has fundamental differences from advisory work," he said. "Accountants do not have the same duties to their clients, or to the courts, as solicitors. It does not therefore follow that because a body’s members provides advisory services in an area that it also ought to be able to conduct litigation in relation to those matters. Finally, this would result in further regulatory complexity, with the number of regulators of this area of legal services increasing and creating multiple levels of regulation, whilst several government consultations are going on to potentially reduce regulation.”

The Law Society had similar concerns about allowing accountants to do probate work. 

James said that since the ICAEW began to licence and regulate probate it had contributed to the regulation of law and that the two professions were "natural allies".

About Nick Huber

Nick Huber profile image

I’m a specialist business journalist and have a particular interest in tax and technology. 


Please login or register to join the discussion.

16th Feb 2016 12:12


wouldnt mind being a Chartered accountant and Notary Public

sounds posh


You just have to certify a few documents and sign the odd passport dont you?

Thanks (0)
By chatman
16th Feb 2016 12:45

Nice to see a professional body sticking up for its members.

Nice to see a professional body (The Law Society) sticking up for its members.

Thanks (0)
16th Feb 2016 16:16

Solicitors in court...

I know a number of Barristers who were equally upset when solicitors were allowed to become 'solicitor advocates' and so were allowed to represent clients in court.

The Bar Council says that arguing a case in court is fundamentally different from the litigation work that solicitors traditionally do.

The words used by the president of the Law Society sound quite familiar!

Thanks (0)
17th Feb 2016 09:09

ACCA are we in as well

ACCA does that include us, as mentioned above its about time the Governing bodies expanded our roles instead of watching it be eroded away.


Extract above

put consumers at risk" and would not be in the public interest.  


The public interest or someone else's interest.

Thanks (0)
23rd Feb 2016 16:30

One Word


The lawyers love it and we won't get it.  Why would anyone appoint an accountant who doesn't have legal privilege over a lawyer who does?

Thanks (0)