Save content
Have you found this content useful? Use the button above to save it to your profile.

Who needs practice focused conferences?

8th Dec 2015
Save content
Have you found this content useful? Use the button above to save it to your profile.

In his 200th article for AccountingWEB, Mark Lee offers advice to accountants who are committed to building a more successful practice.

After writing my last piece for AccountingWeb, I reflected on the views I have often heard from accountants talking about all manner of practice focused training sessions and conferences.

There is a problem here. We often attend these courses and pick up random new ideas, despite not having a specific desire to change the way we do things. Our ambitions are more generic.

At one level most accountants face the same challenges and ambitions. That is, the desire for more clients, better quality clients, more time, higher fees, more money, less hassle, greater efficiency, more support, better trained support, more profits and so on.

This is all very different from the technical side of life. You choose general or specific technical updates depending on the focus of your practice and your client base.

You may or may not put that technical knowledge to immediate use. But, as and when a client needs advice, you will at least recall that something has changed. If need be you will either check it out and get up to speed, or you will recognise you need specialist support.

But practice management and other non-technical courses are something quite different. Pure practice management focused sessions have long attracted audiences that are only a fraction of the size that attend technical courses. The concept is perceived as ‘nice to have’, whereas technical updates are a ‘must have’. I get it. There is also a degree of cynicism. “I have built my practice. I don’t need anyone else telling what I must do to become more successful.” I get that too, and it’s why I rarely offer such definitive advice.

Inevitably some of the stories shared by speakers at practice focused conferences are met with envy and, quite often, disbelief. It’s not that the speakers of award-winning practices are disbelieved, but some audience members doubt their own ability to achieve similar outcomes. Or they don’t want to do what it takes to achieve the same as the speakers.

This is odd because the more successful practices frequently tell the same stories. There will often be overlaps and some repetition of content. This should emphasise the value of their advice.

But still there are audience members saying: “There’s no time. There’s too much work to do. Too many clients to see. I’m already working too many hours each day and week. I can’t make time to work ‘on the business’ every week.” At least these accountants are in the room. Far more choose not to attend in the first place – and that’s fine as long as they feel they are as successful as they want to be. And they have no concerns about the impact of changes happening around us and how that will impact the way clients choose accountants in the future. Or maybe they are taking some other actions to effect changes in the way they run their practice.

What is typically the real draw that gets accountants to attend a practice focused conference? I’m sure it’s not simply to claim CPD points. I suspect the real draw is the technical updates that are usually on offer too.

It still feels worthwhile to attend a technical update even if you conclude that you heard nothing new. As long as the speaker was up to scratch it can still be good news. “It was worth coming just to confirm that I’m not missing anything.” “I can continue to advise and service my clients.” “I’m safe from the risks that follow when advising by reference to guesses, naivety or ignorance.” “I can relax. It was worth coming just to get that sense of relief.”

It’s never the same with practice management conferences. It’s human nature to want to hear something new. Something different you can easily start doing that will enable you to do things better, to raise fees, improve profits, relieve the pressure or whatever.

I suggest that there are only three possible outcomes at the end of such sessions:

  1. You’ve not heard anything new. Just the same old, same old. You had hoped this speaker might have had a new take on things. That they could tell you how to wave a magic wand. Or that all the practice focused advice you have heard previously was wrong and that you were right to ignore it.
  2. You heard some new ideas (or maybe they were old ideas explained differently). You were interested this time as you sort of think you should be doing things differently. You are not as successful as you want to be. You want to accelerate the growth and profitability of your practice. The only problem is that these ‘new’ ideas aren’t a practical solution for you. They won’t work for you and your practice.
  3. You have been inspired to make some changes, You want to do what some of those speakers have recommended. You’ve heard from other practitioners who have become more successful by doing things differently. You are now serious about making changes and, if necessary, doing what some of them did and investing in additional support, coaching or mentoring.

Your reactions to the first two outcomes are probably a mix of disappointment and frustration, or even annoyance that you’ve wasted your time. Though, if truth be told, you may have had unrealistic expectations.

If your reaction was closer to number three then, despite your initial enthusiasm at the end of the conference, within a week you will often be back working in your practice, doing things pretty much the way you have always done them. It’s human nature. You still hope to make time to start thinking about how to make some more detailed changes. One day.

Deep down you want things to be different. You know that unless you take charge and change things, everything will stay the same. Can you do it alone? Maybe. Has that approach worked for you before? Will you be able to do it fast enough without making yourself accountable to someone else? Will the need to get a return on your investment in external support make the difference? It does for some people.

Not everyone needs to engage a mentor or coach to help them move on from where they are to reach where they want to go. Some people manage this simply by talking things through with a ‘spouse’, who then holds them accountable. Others make commitments to staff or colleagues. And some people manage to do it all by themselves.

What about you? How tempted are you to attend practice focused conferences? And how do you ensure you will get full benefit from being there?

Mark Lee FCA is consultant practice editor of AccountingWEB and helps individual accountants who want to be more successful in their practice or career. 


Replies (3)

Please login or register to join the discussion.

By AndrewV12
08th Dec 2015 13:42

Yes were all dinosaurs

We all want change but are never committed to implement it, we all have good ideas but do we always see them through or give them a good long term chance of success.

The going gets tough.....and thats enough change for most of us.




Thanks (2)
By carnmores
08th Dec 2015 17:24

indeed we are
Any sub editors around

Thanks (1)
By N.Krishnaswamy
09th Dec 2015 14:42

To become an ambassador, one must be a close friend  of the Prime Minister or the External Affairs minster or a close friend of them, to whom the PM or EAM listens or have a concern, as can be seen from the past history of more than 500 years.

Similarly when a person starts practice, if he has the good luck to be supported by.a growing business group with vision for expansion, he will have the intensity to learn, study and understand things in order to suitably advise the group. Once he is successful with that group, other businessmen also approach voluntarily to seek his advice and he can grow his business demanding better fees and employing better people. That is how the practice grows as can be seen from the past history of development of accounting practice since the last 150 years.

But if an individual starts his practice serving the local individuals, small business men and taxpayers, who do not have much to offer challenges, one cannot expect him to learn new things, but his attending professional conference may be useful to  him but to a limited extent,  since he may not have the time and opportunity to apply most of the things, like corporate governance, Accounting standards relating to  e.g. employee options, classification of liabilities, since he may not be auditing big companies.

These conferences will be more useful to middle level firms and employees of the companies , who may  not have the time and inclination to read professional magazines regularly to update themselves and the conferences are easy way to learn something and the opportunity to discuss with old friends whom they meet at the conference.

The bigger firms who can afford to employ professionals to make study and prepare papers for in house circulation for the other people to know and they do not need the conference to know freshly  anything. But they attend and do useful service,by demonstrating their specialized knowledge on their chosen subjects, at least to those  middle and small firms , who may,  if at all, have similar problems like the the problems outlined  by them and get an idea as to how to overcome the problem.

In practice, not only profession knowledge matters, but more of contacts who recognize that knowledge useful to them and to their friends.

Thanks (0)