Mentor and Speaker for accountants BookMarkLee
Share this content

Setting fees when starting up in practice

13th Mar 2014
Mentor and Speaker for accountants BookMarkLee
Share this content
Kashflow logo

Accountants, of all professionals, are the ones who should be best placed to set their fees so as to cover their costs and generate a sufficient profit, writes Mark Lee.

The challenge when starting out though is that often there are only limited fixed costs to cover, no direct staff costs and only negligible variable costs. As you start to build up your practice how do you decide what to charge?

The historical approach was to focus on what you wanted to earn per hour and then to set an hourly charge-out rate. I sense that few start-up practices can afford to operate on this basis any more.

As one accountant mentioned to me recently: The idea of quoting fixed fees and value based fees isn’t new or revolutionary any more. It’s the norm.”

This may overstate how far we have come but it does confirm my view that start-up practices need to identify fixed prices for their services rather than quote hourly rates. The only common exception is where your services are limited to bookkeeping.

Undercutting the competition

There is an understandable temptation to sound out some of the local accountants and then to set your fees lower than everyone else.

Whilst understandable it is not likely to prove a good move beyond the short-term.  

Clients you win from other accountants will be likely to move on again just as soon as someone else offers a cheaper service.

And anyone choosing you as their first accountant will only ever budget for your low start-up fees - you will struggle to get them to move up to pay higher fees.

What do you want to earn?

Whilst it may take some time to build up to a full-time practice, at some point you need to consider how much you want to earn from your practice.

But as your practice grows, you need to know how to choose whether or not to take on a new client. This will partly depend on how much you can earn for doing their books and tax - or whatever other services they need.

At some point you will need to consider how much time you have to do billable work each week/month/year - note I used the phrase ‘billable work’ here.

Even if you were prepared to work eight hours a day, five days a week for 45 weeks of the year, you would still be unlikely to bill for the full 1,800 hours a year.

You need to allocate time for admin, marketing, networking, strategy, training and CPD.

Your fees will need to be sufficient to provide you with the income you would like from your practice and cover your expenses.

One mistake I have seen many times is when accountants start-up working from home and do not factor in premises costs to their calculations.

That’s fine unless they one day decide to move to new offices. Clients may resent any consequential increase in fees. Does it matter to them whether you operate from home or from an office? Will they be really be willing to start paying you more just because you have moved to more costly premises?

Basic or higher value servicing

Whether or not you undercut the competition, you need to be clear as to the style of service you will provide and whether to charge for anything beyond the absolute basics.

There are plenty of people who only want the simplest and most basic service. They can appreciate why a higher value style of service would cost more and do not want this.  There is little point in offering a Rolls-Royce approach if your clients would be happy with a VW Polo.

This is important too when it comes to comparing yourself with the competition. If your service will be different, how will you make this clear so that clients are prepared to pay appropriately? You want to avoid building up resentment among clients used to a higher level of service than you are offering for your lower fee.

What are you quoting for?

Many startups take on small clients who just want their tax returns completed. Others just want their accounts produced or maybe some support with bookkeeping and payroll.

Many new clients are unaware of what they really need from an accountant and only ask for some of this. Therefore, there are huge dangers if you take on work and fail to ensure that both you and the client are agreed as to what the range of your services will be.

This is all especially important if you are quoting a fixed fee. What does it cover? What is excluded? And, most importantly, can you explain this - verbally and in writing - using client friendly language that is not a complete turnoff?

Menu driven pricing

Just as with a restaurant, dry cleaner or hairdresser you offer a range of services and clients may want different things. If you use the menu driven approach you can help ensure that the client understands four important issues:

  • The range of services they really need
  • How the total ‘fixed’ fee is determined
  • What elements of the service they get for ‘free’
  • The full range of services you can provide when need more. It also helps with them making referrals to you. You may price some of the advisory services as ‘subject to agreement’.

This approach will often mean you end up earning higher fees than you might have otherwise.

There is also the psychological impact of using menu driven pricing. When was the last time you tried to negotiate the prices being charged by reference to a menu? It’s rare.

You can have different menus for different types of clients (eg: sole traders and limited companies) and for different sizes of clients.

There is some clever software available that can help you determine your menu driven prices. I tend to think it best though to have this clearly set out in print and/or online.

I fully appreciate that there are many variables so you will need to make some broad brush assumptions to keep your menu simple and client friendly.

How much?

The bottom line is that accountants in different parts of the country charge very different fees. There are plenty of discussion threads on AccountingWEB in which members share the fees they charge and discuss whether quoted fees are too low or too high.

One conclusion I draw from such discussion threads is that most members are able to make the broad brush assumptions I suggested are necessary for menu driven pricing.

If you started up in practice recently, how did you decide what to charge initially and how has this changed?

Mark Lee is consultant practice editor of AccountingWEB. Beyond this he facilitates The Inner Circle group for accountants, is a regular speaker on professional business development related issues and is Chairman of the Tax Advice Network of independent tax specialists.

Replies (21)

Please login or register to join the discussion.

Man of Kent
By Kent accountant
13th Mar 2014 12:36


Now approaching the end of my third year in practice I'm quite comfortable quoting for fees, thats not to say I don't get it wrong occasionally (good and bad).

When I started out though it was a difficult concept compounded by the fact that I went from full time employment to day rate consultancy work to fixed fee accountancy work.

Initially I saw prospects who were paying say £1,000 a year for basic compliance work.

My first thought (to myself) was how the hell can I make enough money charging that amount!?

My first comment to the prospect was " our fees will be £900".


So, yes I did often make the mistake of low balling, fortunately though most of those clients were using large regional practices and were paying too much.

I also found that through efficiencies that its relatively straight forward to make a good living from £900 - £1,000 clients provided:

1. You have good systems.

2. You're clear on the services offered.

3. You charge for extras.

I then moved onto menu type pricing (still have the menu cards) which worked well, more so for enabling me to know (from memory without referring to the card) when speaking to a prospect what I would be quoting.

Now, through meeting the prospect, gaining an understanding of their business and the services they want, offering some advice which demonstrates that you can provide them with a good service; then I'm able to quote higher fees that I used to and win the work.


Thanks (5)
By jored89
13th Mar 2014 20:42

brand new
Hi we are starting out offering paperless solutions using xero and receipt bank just looking at which payroll add on to use just quoting your up for new clients. Have found it easier to attract new start ups who are attracted by the cloud and new technology but much harder for potential clients who are with the. Old style more traditional high street practices intending to advertise through social media to find clients all suits me well as I had a stroke nearly four years ago now and finding resultant disability quite restricting in getting a new job. I am really finding myself less disabled up in the cloud, but hints and tips welcomed

Thanks (3)
By chatman
14th Mar 2014 12:27

Pricing Technique

I use the method described by another AWeb contributor, which as as follows:

"You’re in the meeting with the prospect; you’ve created an excellent impression and they are falling over you begging for an engagement letter (okay, I might have exaggerated slightly!) and just want to get the price agreed before they leave excitedly to go and tell their co-directors about the fantastic new firm of accountants they’ve just engaged. At this point your throat becomes dry; your hands shake; you look at your shoes; cough and then as the previous respondent says, stick a wet finger in the air. After ummming and arrrring for a while, followed by a few sharp intakes of breath (well...that’s what the guy in the garage does…and he does lots of pricing!) you finally think of a number. It’s not as much as you’d really want but you couldn’t possibly ‘get away’ with any more… Then you open your mouth to give the client the good news…and halve it. The client doesn’t bat an eyelid…says “fine”, signs up and goes on his way."

Thanks (4)
Replying to lionofludesch:
By farrcorfe
14th Mar 2014 14:33


Yes, that sounds abut the norm. We are usually afflicted with what is known as 'mental/fiscal drag'. Your head says (say) £1,000 but when you open your mouth £750 comes out!

Thanks (2)
By ejkless
14th Mar 2014 13:59

Pricing is an art
Much to agree with here, save the notion that bookkeepers can't set a fixed price. They can, do and should.

With regard to setting a price, it is an art, not a science. That said, it is certainly not about just guess, but rather discernment. For more, please read Ron Baker's book Implementing Value Pricing.

Thanks (1)
By Tom 7000
14th Mar 2014 14:24

two tier system

when you start from home the prices are lower because you have no overheads, That way you can attract more clients on a simple supply and demand curve.

When you move to new offices you just keep the old clients on the old rates and double??  the fees for the new ones.

I reckon the average life expectancy of a client is 5 years...youll soon find the old ones have gone and the new ones are the norm.

As you take on (more) staff...that young lady who qualified with KPMG who you have offered a job for wants ...gulp how much??? Up go the fees again but to the new clients.

Then increase ema ll each year by 5% for inflation

Thats what I would do...but then...what do I know ;) 


Also the comment about...omg how will I do all this work for £1000/£ had a job it paid you £40k a year or whatever as apprentice assistant accountant to the blah can do a £1000 job in 2 cant tell me its not worth doing... well unless you were a partner in PWC or a plc which case you are doing this for fun now not the money.


Thanks (2)
By JCresswellTax
14th Mar 2014 14:30

Slightly surprising

But this is definitely a good article!  Actually find myself agreeing with most, if not all, of it! :)

Thanks (1)
By TonyJackson
14th Mar 2014 14:56


All very interesting to read but I am really struggling with it!

I have just got my practice licence as an AICB and slowly getting my bookkeeping practice off the ground with some networking events looming........aaagh... so what am I going to charge for a Tax Return or simple accounts for a sole trader? I am operating from London where there is tons of competition I'm sure.

I think I am quite good with meeting people and getting into business discussions but when it comes to the million dollar question........anyone got any ideas for me!!??



Thanks (0)
By Michael C Feltham
14th Mar 2014 14:57

How bizarre!

Let's dispel some erroneous assumptions:


1.  Your are working from home and can therefore afford to charge less!

Nice idea!

Problem comes when you are compelled by size and practicality to move to an office and then suffer the whole cost gamut of UBR, Insurance, Compliance to the regime of fire, H and S, Disability Access, Staff and Employer's NIC etc etc.

Do you then hike your fees by 25% or more? If you do then clients walk.......

Consider this rather as with VAT: non-registered. Revenue rises above the mandatory registration threshold and then fees escalate, overnight by 20%. OK, VAT registered clients can claim it back; but only (if on quarterly reporting) after > three months......

My advice: exploit your benefit for yourself as long as you can: save for the cost add-ons of that office!

2.   I will charge much less from the outset to build client base:


You are either worth what "The market will bear": or you are not.

If not, then think of something else to do!

Overall advice on fees:

A. Never, ever quote fixed fees: this is a trap as every job and assignment will suffer hidden costs that soak up billing time. Do you really love working for nothing?

B.  Analyse time and cost; rigorously!

Most small businesses do not: and if one analyses the owner's time, capital sunk and meagre returns, then they would be better off employed, leave the capital earning its expected derisory returns in an ISA and take the paid holidays, time off sick and the other benefits of employment.

C.   Remember it is marketing: you are actually selling yourself, ergo you need a spiffing USP. Therefore think carefully your personal professional strengths and weaknesses; and focus on selling your strengths.

Sell the advantages to the client: a USP based ONLY on the old chestnut "We're the cheapest!" fails every time.

Unless you are Poundshop..............................


Thanks (1)
By johnjenkins
14th Mar 2014 14:58

When I first started

the charge out rate to the client was per 6 mins work, including lunch and phone calls. You decide how much you want to earn per hour (productive or not) lets say £50, you then charge client (for work done) £150 per hour. So it's one for the money, two for the show, three to get ready, now go accts. go.

Thanks (2)
By nickja
14th Mar 2014 15:56

Menu driven pricing

"There is some clever software available that can help you determine your menu driven prices."

Search as I might, Mark, I can't find any such software.   Do you remember a name or any other clue?


Thanks (1)
By pauljohnston
14th Mar 2014 18:33

I would be interested too

So Mark please help here.


I did look at one company's offereing but we were stuck with its fee rates which were grate for Norfolk but a bit low for us,  see

Thanks (1)
Man of Kent
By Kent accountant
14th Mar 2014 19:37


It's definitely worth doing, for me it was the realisation:

At the start:

1) How low (relatively) accountancy fees are for small businesses - I was out of practice for 16 years and the last company I was FD of had a large five figure audit/accountancy/tax fee.

2) At the start of your practice when you might consider  £1,000 clients the norm, getting enough of them to provide you with the same income you had in full time employment seems a daunting task.

After a while:

3) How much work you can get done in a day working efficiently - a £1,000 job can definitely be done in two days even allowing for admin/CPD/networking etc.

4) How quickly client numbers grow once you have spread the word with your networking, advertising, doing a good job and getting referred.


Thanks (1)
Replying to Ruddles:
By Old Greying Accountant
18th Mar 2014 10:32

Get the right software...

Kent accountant wrote:

It's definitely worth doing, for me it was the realisation:

At the start:

1) How low (relatively) accountancy fees are for small businesses - I was out of practice for 16 years and the last company I was FD of had a large five figure audit/accountancy/tax fee.

2) At the start of your practice when you might consider  £1,000 clients the norm, getting enough of them to provide you with the same income you had in full time employment seems a daunting task.

After a while:

3) How much work you can get done in a day working efficiently - a £1,000 job can definitely be done in two days even allowing for admin/CPD/networking etc.

4) How quickly client numbers grow once you have spread the word with your networking, advertising, doing a good job and getting referred.

... with IRIS a £1000 fee where they have well kept records on a decent book-keeping package should easily feasibly be completed in a day!

Thanks (0)
By Jason Dormer
14th Mar 2014 20:29


Always amazes me that so many accountants freeze when being asked a price, I think that the issue is so much a bigger one in the accountants head than the potential clients head.

After a short while in practice you ask the questions, you assess the client, the sector, the scope, the volume, the standard, the turnover, the risk, the potential and so on, you have a very good idea of how many hours will be used up and you quote the appropriate fee.  Look the client firmly in the eye and quote with confiendence.  99 times out of a 100 the client will go with you if he is confident with you, and wont quibble on price.  For the 1 that doesn't is it a loss?  Building a practice should be based on quality not quantity.  I'd rather have 100 clients paying £1500 than 150 clients paying £1000!

Thanks (3)
By eppingaccountant
15th Mar 2014 08:37

Poor Article

Sorry Mark, I hugely respect you and read your articles with interest but this one does not come to any firm coclusions and does not answer the issue that the article title implies.

When any accountant quotes for fees they should, from their past experience (and this includes working for a firm previously if you are setting up on your own) make a valued judgement of the time invloved based upon the client size, standard of bookkeeping, personality and attitude of the client and so forth and of course the range of services they require.  You then apply your required hourly rate, add on say 10% for contingencies and quote.  In some cases you will slightly under recover in other cases over recover.

As to the argument about under quoting if working from home with low overheads then moving into offices at a future point, I commend Tom7000's comments above.  This is correct. Average client life is say 5 years, keep the former ones on the same rate, start the new ones on a higher rate and in time the former ones will drop out.

In practice I have found that if you are good at what you do, clients are willing to pay more than your original fixed fee quote if they are happy with you and you have built up a good working relationship with them.  We are in the business of selling a service and the majority of clients (not all) are decent people, willing to pay more if you can justify why you are charging more - and finally when you put your fee in writing, be it a "fixed" fee or otherwise, it is best to refer to it as a fee estimate rather than a fee quote.


Thanks (0)
Mark Lee 2017
By Mark Lee
07th Apr 2014 13:52


Thanks for your opening comment - tho not the title you chose to use. Given the variations in fees around the country I didn't think it would help anyone to suggest specific numbers. You seem to suggest that accountants should sell their services by reference to how long they spend doing the work. I'm afraid we are poles apart. But if your way works for you then it matters not. I doubt many long established accountants would agree with the suggestion (made previously) that typical clients only stay for 5 years. I suspect this is more relevant for start up firms that have yet to work out which clients they really want and who have tried to increase low fees as the practice builds in size.

Thanks (1)
By ireallyshouldknowthisbut
17th Mar 2014 10:25

Pricing is very much a function of the type and size of clients you have.

The bigger/messier they are, the more you lean towards time as you have to 'push back' on the client in terms of where the boundaries are and its far more variable. 

The simpler/predictable the more you lean towards fixed/menu pricing.

I tend to fix what I can and go hourly only for the unpredictable elements. Most of what I do is very very small.  I have only 5 or 6 £1million+ t/o business and most of those are really simple.  The majority are £100k t/o small service biz's which are run by one or two people. Fixed fees work a treat for those as you know it will be done inside a day max two. 


Thanks (1)
By justsotax
17th Mar 2014 10:37

in the context of

a new start up costing is one of the most difficult areas.  Experience will often not help because you are costing based upon your own business plans/expectations and this will inevitably relate to your requirements/circumstances (you may continue to work from home forever...moving to an office is no certainty).  It is also probable that in your previous experience as an employee you will have only done one part of the bookkeeping tax and accounts involved, suddenly you may be required to do all three...something that will make judging the time you will take (and charging accordingly) very difficult...well for giving a fee estimate anyway).

Thanks (1)
By ming_the_reasonable
31st Mar 2014 18:52

Just in the nick of time!

Thanks for this article. I'm seriously thinking of starting up my own practice and want to get my fees onto the right footing from the start.

I was advised once by a partner of a firm I used to work for to consider what I'd like to earn per hour and then treble it. One third for me, one third for admin time, overhead and unforeseen costs (like phone calls) and one third for profit to bank for future investment (or to keep).

Thanks (0)
Replying to John Stokdyk:
By andy.partridge
02nd Apr 2014 10:12

Only one part of the equation

ming_the_reasonable wrote:

I was advised once by a partner of a firm I used to work for to consider what I'd like to earn per hour and then treble it. One third for me, one third for admin time, overhead and unforeseen costs (like phone calls) and one third for profit to bank for future investment (or to keep).

Nice idea, and we all want our internal 'hourly rate' to be has high as possible (surely), but you are left with the problem of convincing prospects that you are worth it, especially if another accountant down the road is considerably cheaper. Old fashioned supply and demand theory will win through in the end.
Thanks (1)