How to handle difficult people
Mark Lee suggests some of the methods accountants can use when dealing with difficult clients, colleagues, partners and tax officers.
Probably one of the worst aspects of being in practice - or indeed of any working environment - is having to deal with difficult people. Sole practitioners who operate without staff and who are very choosy about their clients may only encounter difficult people in HMRC. At the other extreme, a manager in a larger firm might encounter difficult colleagues, junior staff, partners and clients, as well as fellow professionals in other firms and employees at all levels in HMRC.
1. Separate the person from the problem If you need to confront the client, colleague or third party, be clear that it’s their behaviour rather than them that is the problem.
2. Affirm rather than accuse Focus on how YOU feel as a result of their behaviour; ie “when you do that, I feel…” rather than “you make me feel…”
3. Promise yourself a reward When you can’t avoid a meeting or telephone conversation with a difficult person, promise yourself a reward if you handle things well. The reward might be chocolate, a quick look at a favourite website, an extra treat on your way home or anything else.Or team up with a colleague and reward each other.
4. Keep your cool Don’t make matters worse by getting into a heated argument, shouting or going off in a huff.
5. Keep notes Make notes during the meeting or phone call or as soon as you can afterwards. Be absolutely clear about what transpired and the advice you gave, promises you agreed or threats you made. The clients, colleagues and inspectors from hell are the ones most likely to cause grief down the line, so the more contemporaneous records you have, the less mud can stick.
Most of us have to deal with difficult people at work. How difficult a person is to deal with depends on our self-esteem, self-confidence and our professional courage. Dealing with difficult people is easier when the person is just generally obnoxious or when the behaviour affects more than one person. The task becomes much tougher when they are attacking you personally or undermining your professional contribution.
Your basic options
One way or another you have to decide whether to ignore the difficult behaviour (perhaps you will rise above it); to confront the person; delegate your dealings with them (whether to a colleague, a junior person or a more senior one); or remove the need for interactions (whether by you or them leaving the position that gives rise to the difficult interactions).
Ignore the behaviour
This is easier said than done, and may come across as submissive or non-assertive. It is rarely the best solution except on those occasions where you will not need to interact with the person again. In such cases you may get what you need or resolve matters simply by ignoring their challenging behaviour.
Confront the person
This requires you to be assertive and to avoid the temptation to be aggressive. This means you must accept that however difficult the other person may be, they still have rights and so do you. When you are assertive you recognise that you are entitled to information, clarification or a reply but that your entitlement is no greater (or less) than the other person’s entitlement to respect, politeness and honesty. When you act aggressively, you deny the other person their rights.
The other option is to act submissively or non-assertively, which means you deny your own rights. If this is your default position then you would probably benefit from some assertiveness training. It’s hard to respect non-assertive professional advisers.
Of course, this is easier said than done. Many of us have worked for an aggressive boss who we think revels in their ability to bully us. This may force us into a non-assertive stance. It will rarely enable us to get the best outcome.
Assertiveness is a skill. It’s not natural for everyone and can take practice to strike the right balance so that you do not come across as aggressive. Being naturally assertive is a skill worth developing.
Delegate or share
I’m a firm believer in keeping the end in mind, by which I mean focusing on the desired outcome.
Let’s say you are having difficulty securing the desired (fair) outcome in negotiations with an inspector at HMRC. Might someone else in the firm have ideas that could help resolve things? Is it more important that you be seen to have resolved things alone or that you/the firm secures the best possible outcome?
If a difficult client is taking too long to produce the necessary papers or to respond to your enquiries, perhaps someone else could go to meet them face to face or simply to collect things?
The drastic solution is to resign and move on, arrange for the difficult junior staff member to be moved on (following due process of course), or to tell the client that you no longer want to act for them (yes you can!).
Mark Lee is chairman of the Tax Advice Network and consultant practice editor for AccountingWEB. He writes a regular blog for ambitious professionals: www.BookMarkLee.co.uk/blog
You might also be interested in
These days I describe myself as an 'Immediate Futurist' This reflects my main focus and helps distinguish me from the more general futurologists. Sometimes I am booked to speak after they have highlighted longer term trends and changes.
My own focus involves highlighting what accountants need to do differently to succeed in the...