"with a story so frothy that it should be an embarrassment to editors"
In addition to Andrew Dodsworth's valid points, might I disillusion Philip Fisher that this saga is all about Farage. He has been the catalyst to expose the unlawful (?) practice of de-banking law-abiding people based on their personal views. De-banking is not the same as de-accounting. Without being able to have a bank account, one cannot transact to survive in the current world: even cash needs to get topped up from somewhere! I hate to be the bearer of bad news but most people can survive without an accountant :-)
From the lightweight research and analysis exhibited in this article I suspect that Mr Fisher saw the name Farage and the blue touch paper was lit . . .
My answers
Don't bring principles into this matter! It's Principal, not Principle PRR :-)
"with a story so frothy that it should be an embarrassment to editors"
In addition to Andrew Dodsworth's valid points, might I disillusion Philip Fisher that this saga is all about Farage. He has been the catalyst to expose the unlawful (?) practice of de-banking law-abiding people based on their personal views. De-banking is not the same as de-accounting. Without being able to have a bank account, one cannot transact to survive in the current world: even cash needs to get topped up from somewhere! I hate to be the bearer of bad news but most people can survive without an accountant :-)
From the lightweight research and analysis exhibited in this article I suspect that Mr Fisher saw the name Farage and the blue touch paper was lit . . .