With the internet 'everyone' is a writer, an author, a blogger. The market is saturated and so the message needs to be more and more outrageous to garner attention.
The message we are being force-fed is 'all women are victims' which is seriously wrong. As for the preposterous Stella Creasey MP conflating this with #MeToo campaigning. The heart sinks, the motive stinks.
Dear Mr Fisher
What a load of twaddle. Have you really been so brainwashed to believe such PC nonsense?
There are no figures that should embarrass the top 6 because there are no conclusions that can be drawn from the data.
You write, ' . . . publication of figures which would finally prove whether women in our industry get as bad a deal as everyone is always imagined.'
Such hyperbole is indicative that your piece has no credibility. You have fallen for the hoax whereby a pressure group starts with the conclusion they wish to reach and misuse the data to make it fit.
Shame on you.
The data poses questions and provides no answers. It is lazy to suggest they do. There is a law in place for equal pay and if this is flouted there is a legal route for redress.
You appear to be 2 days behind in the debate which has already moved on from your stance.
Indeed, they might be even further away! It's a bit like when Derren Brown tells his audience how he did the trick, but you know the genuine explanation is omitted.
True, but for those subject to enquiries there are easy pickings for the HMRC vultures. That should help to redress the 'promotion bias' of the software firms.
My answers
With the internet 'everyone' is a writer, an author, a blogger. The market is saturated and so the message needs to be more and more outrageous to garner attention.
The message we are being force-fed is 'all women are victims' which is seriously wrong. As for the preposterous Stella Creasey MP conflating this with #MeToo campaigning. The heart sinks, the motive stinks.
Dear Mr Fisher
What a load of twaddle. Have you really been so brainwashed to believe such PC nonsense?
There are no figures that should embarrass the top 6 because there are no conclusions that can be drawn from the data.
You write, ' . . . publication of figures which would finally prove whether women in our industry get as bad a deal as everyone is always imagined.'
Such hyperbole is indicative that your piece has no credibility. You have fallen for the hoax whereby a pressure group starts with the conclusion they wish to reach and misuse the data to make it fit.
Shame on you.
When was this and what did you do about it?
The data poses questions and provides no answers. It is lazy to suggest they do. There is a law in place for equal pay and if this is flouted there is a legal route for redress.
You appear to be 2 days behind in the debate which has already moved on from your stance.
Of course, heterosexual couples can have a civil partnership - the absurdity is that they have to be of the same sex.
That's a very, very, very weak argument.
If your terms are 30 days I can not understand why you are happy with payment between 45-60. That’s all.
'Thank God It's not Christmas', by Sparks
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rd6sOaHX0W8
Indeed, they might be even further away! It's a bit like when Derren Brown tells his audience how he did the trick, but you know the genuine explanation is omitted.
True, but for those subject to enquiries there are easy pickings for the HMRC vultures. That should help to redress the 'promotion bias' of the software firms.