Through www.help4lips.co.uk we are attempting to help litigants in person (there are 1m of them forecast) better comprehend the legal profession.
My personal views on double entry book keeping, and how it needs to be consigned to history (in favour of Econometrics and accounts based on cashflow) are well known to anyone who reads my "Mad Lemming" blog.
In other words, I support what the Susskinds are saying in their book
My answers
You're right CHANGE
Francois
You are corrcet:
The legal profession is aiming to have some disputes resolved by Computer within the next four years.
They will learn from the likes of Amazon and E-bay.
We are already attempting to provide information, and have been doing so (very badly, as we are massively under-funded) for the last 3 years.
www.help4lips.co.uk
Accountants are going to be stuck in the 19th Century until they see that cashflow and Econometrics need to replace double entry as a basis.
CHANGE!!!!
Through www.help4lips.co.uk we are attempting to help litigants in person (there are 1m of them forecast) better comprehend the legal profession.
My personal views on double entry book keeping, and how it needs to be consigned to history (in favour of Econometrics and accounts based on cashflow) are well known to anyone who reads my "Mad Lemming" blog.
In other words, I support what the Susskinds are saying in their book
Niche market for 21st Century accountants
Tell the truth, in a transparent way?
what the "F" stands for
You are correct!
What else could it possibly stand for?
:-)
ABSOLUTELY
My "crusade" against D/E is because it puts accountants into a comfort zone (when the books balance) which they are not entitled to be in!
Accounts are too frequently are a mixture of "fraud and negligence", which are not properly investigated because the books balance.
GET IT?
Alternatives
My blog October 11th and 14th 2014
If accountants see a set of accounts balances they DO think they are correct, it is in the DNA they are taught..
If you tell me that statement is not correct you are deluding yourself!
Perhaps what the question really is...................
What happens next:
If we vote to stay in????????
If we vote to leave????????
If we stay in we will have lost a lot of our power, which is the threat of leaving?
If we vote to leave we may set a precedent which will quickly be followed by others?
Dunno!
Perhaps the best answer is to cancel the Referendum?
mwngiol
And you think I am confused?
With a name like that the answer to your last observation in your case is:
BOTH!
:-)
:
Tip to avoid procrastination
JDI
or better still
J(F)DI
ABSOLUTELY
We are in total agreement!
The Legal profession is addressing their historical issues aggresively (read 2nd link in my blog post)
The Accountancy profession continues to have its head in the sand!