EIM00730: "PAYE/NIC may not apply for an officeholder if Extra Statutory Concession A37 applies. This might be considered (broadly) where: The fees are being paid direct to a professional partnership of which the director is a member..."
ESM4022 - Particular occupations: consultants and other professionals: "It is perfectly possible for an employee or a director of a company to provide services quite legitimately to that company in a separate capacity. For example, the individual could be carrying on an established business as a solicitor, estate agent, accountant or some sort of consultant whereby services are supplied to the company on terms similar to those given to other customers. In these cases the payment for the services would not be income from an office or employment assessable under Schedule E/chargeable as employment income or subject to Class 1 NICs."
Again, moved within the last few months (from another supplier of similar services) and again influenced by Paul Scholes (who also wouldn't know about me)
Could go partial exemption and start selling bits of equipment - like exercise balls and those stretchy rubber tubes for strengthening - to get partial exemption and therefore at least claim back some of the vat.
Small local garage paying big fee for no service to a top 10 firm.
Agree fee and shake on it and get signed 64-8.
Week later get email clearly written by the accountant saying how shocked and disappointed client is that we wrote to his accountant and how unprofessional we are to "challenge the strong relationship" he's enjoyed for years.
Yeah, whatever.
This sort of nonsense exists Im afraid. And yes, it's a cliche, but I really do console myself with:
My answers
Another shout out for VT
@mrme89
I always thought you andmrme89 PM | Mon, 08/06/2015 - 15:49 | Permalink
I always thought you and Albert Camus were the same person.
reply quote thanks reportWe've clearly been together too long!
I'm much happier to post and contribute with my nom-de-plume...
...as is my friend and colleague Albert Camus.
Like Democratus, I believe I picked an identity that reflects much about who I believe myself to be and I've remained consistent over the years.
I'm much happier to post and contribute with my nom-de-plume...
...as is my friend and colleague Albert Camus.
Like Democratus, I believe I picked an identity that reflects much about who I believe myself to be and I've remained consistent over the years.
Answering my own question...
Covered in two places:
EIM00730: "PAYE/NIC may not apply for an officeholder if Extra Statutory Concession A37 applies. This might be considered (broadly) where: The fees are being paid direct to a professional partnership of which the director is a member..."
ESM4022 - Particular occupations: consultants and other professionals: "It is perfectly possible for an employee or a director of a company to provide services quite legitimately to that company in a separate capacity. For example, the individual could be carrying on an established business as a solicitor, estate agent, accountant or some sort of consultant whereby services are supplied to the company on terms similar to those given to other customers. In these cases the payment for the services would not be income from an office or employment assessable under Schedule E/chargeable as employment income or subject to Class 1 NICs."
Another vote for hosted desktops...
Again, moved within the last few months (from another supplier of similar services) and again influenced by Paul Scholes (who also wouldn't know about me)
Seamless, excellent service, no regrets.
Steve
As a heavy user of winforecast
I was really upset when sage dropped it.
I've recently noticed this -
http://www.passage.co.nz/sage-winforecast-professional
Not sure if they've bought the rights or are just basing their product on winforecast.
Same here...
as the last two respondents
Could go partial exemption
and start selling bits of equipment - like exercise balls and those stretchy rubber tubes for strengthening - to get partial exemption and therefore at least claim back some of the vat.
https://www.gov.uk/vat-exemption-and-partial-exemption
Yup...
almost identical thing this week.
Small local garage paying big fee for no service to a top 10 firm.
Agree fee and shake on it and get signed 64-8.
Week later get email clearly written by the accountant saying how shocked and disappointed client is that we wrote to his accountant and how unprofessional we are to "challenge the strong relationship" he's enjoyed for years.
Yeah, whatever.
This sort of nonsense exists Im afraid. And yes, it's a cliche, but I really do console myself with:
"Some will, some won't, so what! Next!"