What unfounded accusations?
There are real tangible issues that clearly are mirrored across the uk
What questions are you saying are unanswered?
I have documentary evidence regarding the accountants, report them to who ? I think someone else asked that but that’s unanswered as well.
1004Circumstances in which application not to be made: activities of company
(1)An application under section 1003 (application for voluntary striking off) on behalf of a company must not be made if, at any time in the previous three months, the company has—
(a)changed its name,
(b)traded or otherwise carried on business,
(c)made a disposal for value of property or rights that, immediately before ceasing to trade or otherwise carry on business, it held for the purpose of disposal for gain in the normal course of trading or otherwise carrying on business, or
(d)engaged in any other activity, except one which is—
(i)necessary or expedient for the purpose of making an application under that section, or deciding whether to do so,
(ii)necessary or expedient for the purpose of concluding the affairs of the company,
(iii)necessary or expedient for the purpose of complying with any statutory requirement, or
(iv)specified by the Secretary of State by order for the purposes of this sub-paragraph.
No I am not taking all accountants. It’s my reference to the same accountants involved with all the companies in this situation, may be its you trying to drag my concerns of the tangible issues of the rails. That said do accountants report the acts of other firms ? I would add that this situation is only going to get worse as long as people look the other way.
David, the system clearly needs to change. It’s an increasing situation that is causing substantial loss to the system as well as feeding criminal behaviour. Those that are entrusted to pursue issues are clearly only pursuing the legally based individuals as they are trying to adhere to the system, and that said contributing to the system. But others are blatantly not over and over again. Another example the particular firm of accountants involved have assisted in Bangladesh people coming to this country following marriage to there uk partner based on false income declaration. Further the abuse of the companies act has allowed several of these companies to be closed once served with civil penalties for employing illegal immigrants. Not to mention all the innocent creditors loosing out each time. This is why the companies act needs to be enforced as the issues span way out and it’s costing us all thousands.
The rent came from the tenant at all times. Do you not see the implications and abuse of the system. The revenue denied to the country and desperately needed services. Do you support this behaviour, are you passive and just of the view look the other way. This is accounting and accountants creating fraud
My answers
What unfounded accusations?
There are real tangible issues that clearly are mirrored across the uk
What questions are you saying are unanswered?
I have documentary evidence regarding the accountants, report them to who ? I think someone else asked that but that’s unanswered as well.
Bernard.
1. A person
2. N/a
3. Moneys outstanding to us are around £30k
Thank you for asking
May be it was just your negative approach. Can you contribute something positive please
1004Circumstances in which application not to be made: activities of company
(1)An application under section 1003 (application for voluntary striking off) on behalf of a company must not be made if, at any time in the previous three months, the company has—
(a)changed its name,
(b)traded or otherwise carried on business,
(c)made a disposal for value of property or rights that, immediately before ceasing to trade or otherwise carry on business, it held for the purpose of disposal for gain in the normal course of trading or otherwise carrying on business, or
(d)engaged in any other activity, except one which is—
(i)necessary or expedient for the purpose of making an application under that section, or deciding whether to do so,
(ii)necessary or expedient for the purpose of concluding the affairs of the company,
(iii)necessary or expedient for the purpose of complying with any statutory requirement, or
(iv)specified by the Secretary of State by order for the purposes of this sub-paragraph.
Does anyone realise that a company can’t be struck -off if it’s been trading for 3 months or more
No I am not taking all accountants. It’s my reference to the same accountants involved with all the companies in this situation, may be its you trying to drag my concerns of the tangible issues of the rails. That said do accountants report the acts of other firms ? I would add that this situation is only going to get worse as long as people look the other way.
?
David, the system clearly needs to change. It’s an increasing situation that is causing substantial loss to the system as well as feeding criminal behaviour. Those that are entrusted to pursue issues are clearly only pursuing the legally based individuals as they are trying to adhere to the system, and that said contributing to the system. But others are blatantly not over and over again. Another example the particular firm of accountants involved have assisted in Bangladesh people coming to this country following marriage to there uk partner based on false income declaration. Further the abuse of the companies act has allowed several of these companies to be closed once served with civil penalties for employing illegal immigrants. Not to mention all the innocent creditors loosing out each time. This is why the companies act needs to be enforced as the issues span way out and it’s costing us all thousands.
Yes I DO mean some accountants. Thank you
The rent came from the tenant at all times. Do you not see the implications and abuse of the system. The revenue denied to the country and desperately needed services. Do you support this behaviour, are you passive and just of the view look the other way. This is accounting and accountants creating fraud