Tax expert warns against excessive remuneration. By Dan Martin

Kashflow logo
Share this content

Accountants should ensure their small owner managed business clients are aware of excessive remuneration for family members, a leading tax expert has urged.

The warning was made by lecturer Nichola Ross Martin during the latest AccountingWEB breakfast tax tutorial held in the lavish surroundings of the Law Society's headquarters in central London.

After enjoying morning coffee and croissants, the AccountingWEB contributing editor drew the attention of the 40 delegates in attendance to the rules to watch out for when advising SME clients on employee remuneration and benefits.

"HMRC is increasingly attacking the remuneration strategies of owner-managed businesses," she said. "Businesses and their...

Please Login or Register to read the full article

The full article is available to registered members only. To read the rest of this article you’ll need to login or register. Registration is FREE and allows you to view all content, ask questions, comment and much more.

About AccountingWEB


Please login or register to join the discussion.

28th Aug 2006 09:49

Pensions again
So am I to understand that the Government and Revenue don't agree on pensions then?
The Government tell us we have to put more into our pensions (uh, because they've seriously fluffed their management of that one too...), but now the Revenue will penalise you for providing better pensions for staff.
Shame on them!!

Thanks (0)
23rd Aug 2006 16:26

I know of a cookie who buys Jaffa cakes instead of chocolate biscuits. Personally, I think its being done for tax avoidance reasons.

Thanks (0)
23rd Aug 2006 12:52

home working
Ross Martins comments were noteworthy..
Where do you acess these allowable expenses and benefits..any clues on which IR homepage or manual?

How does one determine whether home wirking is mandatory?? Do we include a clause in the contract of employment??

Thanks (0)
24th Aug 2006 00:54

economic cycle
While accountants across the rest of the world are coming up with brilliant schemes to avoid tax, the British accountancy profession is advising clients a bicycle.

Isn't that just typical.

Thanks (0)
24th Aug 2006 09:00

Bicycle perk
Can you recommend a dealaer who may be able to provide a bicycle to a man with one leg?
Free parking of course is another perk for the disabled!

Thanks (0)
23rd Aug 2006 17:01

Not that easy
I would love to cycle to work but the hills around here would kill me if the traffic didn't.

We have considered encouraging staff to cycle to work - they are keen, and the tax-free cyclists' breakfasts perk was a big attraction here - but having to create appropriate changing rooms and shower facilities made the whole project a non-starter. (Why don't bikes have proper mud guards any more?)

I bet someone out there has done a spreadsheet to work out if a company bike is worthwhile compared with the 20p per mile authorised tax-free rate for use of your own bike for business travel!

Don't forget employer-provided protective gear for cyclists is also tax -free. I'm just not sure about the heath and safety implications of providing staff with company bikes - are we liable if they get injured/killed? Do we need to provide training too? The implications are endless.

Thanks (0)
29th Aug 2006 14:25

cycling, health and safety
If your company doesn't provide training or safety equipment for employees when they're out on business as pedestrians, is there any good reason why you should supply them for cyclists, given that cycling is, in much of the UK, safer per unit distance than walking?

NB be very careful about making assumptions as to what appropriate safety equipment is. In general, it may be better to provide guidance as to where to find out more information; do not provide specific equipment unless the user requests it, at their own risk. This applies in particular to helmets (the safety case for which is, at best, ambiguous); you're on safer ground with gloves and, it has been argued, panniers.

Your local council may well offer free or subsidised on-road training: it may be useful to point your employees at that.

For employees who know they want to cycle and who would cycle a reasonably large distance annually on (non-commuting) business journeys, the mileage allowance for their own bike use is probably most advantageous. For others, company pool bikes made available under the cycle-to-work initiative for combined work & personal use may be a viable and cost-effective solution, with bike maintenance outsourced to a local bike shop.

Disclaimer: this comment does not constitute professional advice.

Edit: For Ronald Morris - the "All abilities cycling guide", from Transport for London and the London Cycling Campaign, available at , covers cycling for disabled people.

Thanks (0)
By Spoggle
23rd Aug 2006 12:33

Company bicycles
Are you serious? Company bicylces as a "top" benefit? I would be very interested to know whether anyone at all has taken up cycling to and from work for tax reasons alone.

Thanks (0)
23rd Aug 2006 15:45

I cycled to work once but I was put off the idea by some guy in a Ferrari flashing at me trying to overtake while I was in the fast lane of the M40! :)

Thanks (0)
25th Aug 2006 11:17

Revenue's March Guidance on Pension Contributions
Can someone point me in the right direction for this - Nichola refers to it in her article.

Many thanks.

Thanks (0)