Senior Policy & Research Officer CIPP
Share this content

Employment allowance: The unexpected consequences

23rd Jul 2019
Senior Policy & Research Officer CIPP
Share this content
Businessman holds pile of office papers and documents
istock_drogatnev_aw

From April 2020, the employment allowance is to be restricted to those with only secondary class 1 National Insurance Contributions of less than £100,000.

Samantha Mann, senior policy and research officer at the CIPP, explores the unexpected consequence this proposal will have on affected employers.

Introduction

Brought in from April 2014 and available to business and charities, regardless of their size and current National Insurance Contributions (NIC) liability, the employment allowance aspired to stimulate growth in employment.

From April 2020, the employment allowance is to be restricted to employers with a secondary NICs bill in the preceding tax year of less than £100,000.

As a result of this restriction of eligibility for employment allowance, from April 2020 the employment allowance is to be reclassified as de minimis state aid.

State aid

State aid is provided by a public body falls into one of three categories:

  • De minimis
  • Block grant
  • Aid requiring prior notification and approval

We interest ourselves only with de minimis state aid.

De minimis state aid

De minimis aid can be given for many different purposes. The amounts are generally small and are subject to an overall ceiling of €200,000 over a three-year financial period.

The sterling equivalent amount is calculated by reference to the rate applicable on the written date of offer, which for the employment allowance will be 1 April.

Requirements must be met for a public body to give de minimis support, which are:

  • Is the support (which can include services as well as cash) being ‘granted by the state’?
  • Does the assistance give advantage over an undertaking or group of undertakings? (an undertaking is any organisation engaged in economic activity)
  • Does the assistance distort or have the potential to distort competition?
  • Does the assistance affect trade between EU member states?

The employment allowance (excluded persons) regulations 2019

Regulations have been laid by HM Treasury and are now open to scrutiny and technical consultation, which will close on 23 August 2019.

Excluded person – exceeding £100,000 secondary Class 1 liability

The regulations make clear that where a ‘person’, who may be a company, a charity or connected with another company or charity, has a secondary Class 1 liability of £100,000 or more in the previous tax year, they cannot qualify for employment allowance.

For the purpose of clarity, I will refer to a ‘person’ as an employer going forward.

From April 2020, the employer will need to ensure that any carried forward element within their payroll software, which indicates that they will be claiming the employment allowance, is deselected. If using an external payroll service, the employer will need to ensure that they communicate this change.

In addition, the employer will become excluded if, during the tax year, they become connected with a company or group of companies that have previously been excluded because their secondary Class 1 liability exceeded £100,000.

Excluded person – de minimis ceiling could be breached

In addition to the exclusion based on secondary Class 1 liabilities, an employer could also become ineligible where they are or have been in receipt of de minimis state aid and by claiming the £3,000 they will breach their ceiling of €200,000.

This is an all or nothing situation, where an employer may breach the ceiling if they were to claim the full £3,000 then they cannot claim – even if in reality they wouldn’t claim the entire amount and indeed the amount that they would claim would not result in a breach.

Record keeping is key to the success of this policy. The employer must be able to keep an accurate record of de minimis funding received for three years.

Employer declaration to HMRC

As the public body providing state aid by way of the employment allowance, HMRC will need to be able to demonstrate that they have taken measures to ensure that the ceiling has not been breached. They will need to keep records for ten years.

If the employer is in receipt of de minimis state aid they must provide the following information to HMRC. The method that HM Treasury and HMRC have chosen for this is by way of the RTI system and specifically the Employer Payment Summary (EPS).

In addition to declaring they have checked their secondary class 1 liability for the previous tax year, the following information and declaration must be provided where the employer is or has been in the previous two years allocated de minimis state aid:

  • The amount of de minimis aid from the previous two years, as well as any allocation or receipts for the current year. The value is to be expressed in Euros, using an exchange rate published by HMRC on 1st April.
  • The trade sector that the employer operates ie
    • agriculture
    • aquaculture and fisheries
    • road transport
    • industry or transport
  • where the employer is part of a group they must provide a total amount received collectively across all connected companies for the same period and declare that ‘to the best of their knowledge’ they:
  1. will not exceed the relevant de minimis ceiling for State aid for the sector(s) in which they operate by claiming the full annual amount of an Employment Allowance
  2. are the only connected company making one claim for an Employment Allowance across the whole connected group, as per the requirements at Section 3 & Schedule 1 of NICA 2014
  3. are not aware of any other reason why they would be excluded from claiming an Employment Allowance for any other (eligibility) reason.  

Could there a chink of light?

If you are wondering (indeed hoping) that the UK’s impending exit from the European Union could impact on this, be assured that by virtue of the UK State Aid Regulations this policy isn’t going away any time soon.

An online service could have been built, or adapted, such as the business tax dashboard rather than once again add burden to the employer with their already challenging payroll obligations.

However, alternative proposals are unlikely to happen due to the cost of their development. Already comments have been made that question whether claiming the employment allowance is worth the effort, but we know that for many small employers it is a lifeline.

The CIPP, together with a wide range of stakeholders, particularly experts from the software sector, continues to work with HMRC to address the challenges that this latest proposal presents, not least the timetable.

Replies (5)

Please login or register to join the discussion.

avatar
By waldron
23rd Jul 2019 14:53

Not claiming it should be interesting as HMRC's systems sre not set up to unset the flag at their end by means of an fps or eps as I was told by a rep that no one was expected to do that.

Thanks (0)
Replying to waldron:
avatar
By arowson
24th Jul 2019 10:02

There has always been the facility to submit 'N' in the Employment Allowance Indicator in the EPS to indicate that that the employer ceases to qualify for the allowance.

My understanding is that no claims will be automatically rolled over into the 2020-2021 tax year so all employers that are eligible and want to claim need to have an EPS submitted in order to claim again.

The main problem as I see it is that the regulations state that the claim must be made, and a response affirming that the claim is allowed, BEFORE the allowance can be offset against the employer liability. This does not fit well with the timing of an EPS submission which is meant to be submitted at the end of a tax month.

Thanks (1)
By Charlie Carne
24th Jul 2019 12:23

The other obvious restriction that they should put in place, if they are amending the regulations, is to block any claim for employment allowance against directors' NI. The current rule only prevents claims where a sole director is the sole employee (and can be got around by employing someone else for one pay period at a low salary). They could remove that complexity and simply have a blanket restriction on NI allowance for all directors.

Thanks (0)
7om
By Tom 7000
24th Jul 2019 16:10

is that 100k the employers NIC they are on about ie 13.8% or the enmployees 12%?

or both added together?

Thanks (0)
Replying to Tom 7000:
avatar
By Bsuere
25th Jul 2019 10:45

Going by what the article states, its the secondary class 1 NICs which refers to the employer's NICs only.

Thanks (0)