You might also be interested in
Replies (3)
Please login or register to join the discussion.
Duty of care
I have just looked at the published accounts for this Company for the 4 years up to 30 Sep 2112 and for 2 of these years it showed a MINUS balance sheet. With a £348K tax debt presumably built up over a number of years (probably unpaid paye) how on earth does this Company look to be a reliable provider of services to the NHS? If similar behavior is exhibited at any time in the future will the person responsible for awarding the contract to them be taking responsibility or will another CVA be on the cards. Neil Findlay MSP should be asking a lot more questions about the whole process of awarding contracts and if as I suspect the £348K owed to HMRC was paye and was allowed to build up over a number of years then HMRC are also culpable in allowing this behavior to not only continue but to be rewarded at the expense of every compliant taxpayer. I find myself offended by the whole process and no doubt others will feel the same way.
This is appalling
Why on earth should this company get away with only paying 47% of the PAYE it has withheld from employees? It's about time unpaid PAYE was made the personal responsibility of directors.
Unpaid paye
I agree with "the Poacher" and would go so far as to make the case that failure to remit paye and nic to HMRC following deduction from employees is tantamount to theft. Did the directors of this company take a salary, benefits or other forms of remuneration during the time that this debt was outstanding? I am sure that the best minds in HMRC have considered this!!!