Head of Editorial Sift Media
Share this content
Tags:

HMRC: Aspire on track to save £1bn+

25th Jan 2011
Kashflow logo

HMRC’s Aspire IT outsourcing contract with Capgemini is beginning to deliver savings to HMRC and is likely to generate another £1.2bn in savings by 2017, a senior official claimed this week.

HMRC deputy chief information officer Mark Hall revealed the background economics of the 10 year Aspire contract at the Government ICT 2011 conference in London on Tuesday.

Many people didn’t understand what was happening within HMRC and the role IT was playing in transforming its strategy and reducing the UK budget deficit through more effective revenue collection, Hall told the audience.

“Our IT interacts with everyone in the UK and is critical part of the UK economy. Our online services have grown. On filing day we have been third busiest web site in the world. A lot of people will file over the last week. Across the whole of HMRC, we process over one billion transactions.”

The main plank of HMRC’s information and communications technology (ICT) was the Aspire deal, one of the biggest in the public sector, which accounts for 99% of HMRC’s IT spend. Capgemini is the prime contractor within an “ecosystem” that includes 240 suppliers, Hall said.

The rolling, 10-year IT outsourcing contract has been a source of controversy since HMRC removed the previous contractor EDS and selected the Aspire consortium. The original costs swelled over the original budget to more than £10bn, but have now been reined in, according to Hall.

Please Login or Register to read the full article

The full article is available to registered AccountingWEB.co.uk members only. To read the rest of this article you’ll need to login or register. Registration is FREE and allows you to view all content, ask questions, comment and much more.

Tags:

Replies (2)

Please login or register to join the discussion.

John Stokdyk, AccountingWEB head of insight
By John Stokdyk
26th Jan 2011 09:43

Where's the salt?

While I was posting this article on the site, the thought struck me that when it was in opposition, the Conservative party regularly questioned the operational savings being claimed by Gordon Brown and Alistair Darling in their annual budgets. Could Mr Hall be taking a leaf out of their book, I wonder?

There is no question that EDS were a disaster, but as I recall the Aspire consortium seemed to go back to the government every year during the first part of its engagement to ask for more fees. I wish I had time to go back and check the annual amounts that were paid out - maybe if I get a spare hour or two on Friday afternoon, but this information will be tucked away in all sorts of stray corners in HMRC accounts, NAO reports and parliamentary answers and papers.

That HMRC has managed to rein in the outflow of cash is a good thing, but the bungled transition to the new PAYE system raises the question about the quality of management and service provided. We can only hope that the promised improvements in service are now materialising and that Aspire & HMRC really will be able to deliver all the efficiencies and savings.

Andy White, tax partner at CBW, is even more sceptical: "Regrettably, it seems from this piece that HMRC still don’t get it. Mark Hall is full of fine words... Who could object to an aim to “reduce the UK deficit”? What could be objectionable about “reinventing and innovating without increasing its budget”? And “a customer centric strategy” certainly sounds like a good thing, doesn’t it?
 
"But taxpayers are not customers, no matter how much HMRC likes to categorise them in that way.  What taxpayers want is that HMRC’s investment in IT should produce a system that significantly eliminates the errors that have proliferated in the past.
 
"HMRC has offered incentive after incentive to persuade taxpayers to embrace IT and file online. How frustrating is it then to take advantage of the more lenient filing deadlines for going online, only to find that HMRC’s own systems cannot cope? Returns are rejected and late-filing penalties incurred through no fault of the “customer”.
 
"It is misguided for Mark Hall to compare HMRC to a business in the private sector. If it were, it would have gone bankrupt a long time ago."

Thanks (0)
avatar
By pauljohnston
27th Jan 2011 10:43

Jon

Nicely put.

Ask any accountant that has to deal with HMRC and I bet given the resource he/she could make massive savings at HMRC without any further investment in IT.  One does wonder whether Mr Hall really has any idea what is  going on at HMRC.

customer-centric - what does this mean?

Thanks (0)