IR35: How engagers are minimising risk
Following the publication of the draft legislation for the off-payroll rules to apply in the private sector, those who engage contractors via a personal service company are starting to consider how they will proceed when those rules take effect in April 2020.
Replies (10)
Please login or register to join the discussion.
How engagers are minimising risk? Blanket bans on PSCs.
Engagers are leaning on intermediaries as well - I know of one bank who gave all their contractors the choice of go umbrella or go home, and then forced their consultancies to do the same with their contractors.
I know of another just recently that had a whole dept of contractors - and lost them in almost a day because they refused to deal with the IR35 problem. A problem it is.
IR35 was and is still a crazy idea. No one actually benefits.
It has cost HMRC more than it ever made in their failed legal cases. As antiquated as being locked into long office leases compared to co-working flexible spaces.
Companies need flexibility without employer obligation - contractors want flexibility at the price of losing employment benefits.
This week a PSC contractor client, who had worked on systems in the banking sector, had a bank ring him to ask if he was available and how much he would want. He cranked up his daily rate by 40% to allow for umbrella costs - this being the only way they would engage him. They said yes.
Clearly they were having trouble in obtaining contractors - exactly what happened in the public sector. It won't be too many months before the extra costs persuade them to take a different view on IR35.
We have found almost all of our contractors are getting fired, and rehired on new contracts under IR35 on a blanket approach.
Which I guess is what the government wants, but there are lots of my clients who I would have said are outside of IR35 getting caught up in this over-reaction from business who don't understand IR35 and not even bothering to assess it.
Some of the net to nets I have seen have been shocking. Yesterday I saw one where the guy on £150k was given a full PA in the comp! They couldn't get the ER's NI right either, and were deducting expenses.
But are they getting full employee rights (paid holiday, sickness, pension etc) because this is simply a breach of their rights if they are treated like employees for tax but not for the other benefits? let along they probably still keep their PSC running
Standard umbrella treatment - deduct holiday pay, and then give it back, statutory sick, basic auto enrolled pension (which they can back out of after a week)- all deducted from the contractors gross (old) rate.
So they lose out by having to pay full NI, employers NI, apprenticeship scheme levy.
Further update here:
https://www.gov.uk/government/news/hmrc-announces-change-to-the-off-payr...