Save content
Have you found this content useful? Use the button above to save it to your profile.
Close up shot of a pair of dice rolling down a craps table
istock_jroballo_AW

New government rolls the dice with mini-Budget

by

Kwasi Kwarteng’s statement today went by several names, but in tax terms at least, it is more significant and seismic than any Budget since Britain voted to leave the European Union in 2016.

23rd Sep 2022
Save content
Have you found this content useful? Use the button above to save it to your profile.

Known officially as the Growth Plan 2022, Kwarteng’s mini-Budget or fiscal event sets the country on a different course – one which presents the new Chancellor of the Exchequer and Prime Minister as high-rolling gamblers.

The big question is whether their economic strategy, intended to achieve annual growth of 2.5%, will have the success enjoyed by the likes of investors like George Soros and Warren Buffett or an impact on the country similar to that of Rogue Trader Nick Leeson on Barings Bank, which literally went bust as a result of his billion-dollar gambling spree.

Many of us might enjoy sitting on the sidelines to see whether the new government’s almost unprecedented approach to rescuing the country’s finances works out, were it not for the price that we will all pay if Kwarteng proves to be a Leeson rather than a Soros.

As with every Budget in recent times, many of the juiciest bits were leaked to the media long before the Chancellor made his formal announcement.

Everything has been built around Liz Truss’s theory that by making the rich even richer, for example removing restrictions on bank executives’ bonuses (confirmed today), society will suddenly be awash with cash to feed the hungry, heat the freezing and win the next general election.

Mischievous commentators had suggested that the reason the Chancellor did not want to badge this as a formal Budget was that he would then have had to get proper (and potentially embarrassing) costings from the independent Office for Budget Responsibility, though the government confirmed it will publish its own estimates.

Instead, he went ahead with a fiscal event that contradicted the received wisdom of every previous Tory Chancellor in living memory, let alone their Labour rivals, by simultaneously concentrating on spending and cutting taxes.

Despite the Prime Minister’s initial protestations about offering any kind of support package to those potentially rendered destitute by soaring energy prices, we already knew the level of the energy price cap for Individuals and its equivalent for business, if not the cost to the Exchequer, estimated to be at least £100bn.

Amongst the other headlines from Kwasi Kwarteng’s statement, two of Rishi Sunak’s flagship policies are to be reversed.

His 1.25% NIC levy for both employees and employers to fund the National Health Service and social care will be ditched with effect from 6 November 2022.

In addition, Sunak’s proposal to introduce gradual increases in corporation tax until it reached 25% has bitten the dust. Encouragingly, various investment allowances will also get a boost.

Smaller businesses that are struggling might receive no benefit at all from the reduction in corporation tax rates until they eventually tip into profit. While they will welcome the six months freeze on energy costs, there seems little else to put smiles on the faces of careworn directors, with no announcements of an overhaul of the business rates scheme or reductions in charges.

Elsewhere, there is to be a consultation on the introduction of new Investment Zones across the country and infrastructure rule changes, with loosened planning regulations and a sweetener of tax incentives. Details are sparse at present, although they include NIC and investment reliefs.

There has been much media speculation as to other proposals including two “rabbits” to be pulled out of the hat if the Daily Telegraph was to be believed. In fact, the statement was more like Watership Down at times.

Income tax was inevitably to come under close scrutiny with hints that the 1% reduction in the basic rate planned for immediately before the next general election might come into play from 2023-24. The additional rate of 45% is also abolished but seemingly the zero-rate band will not be extended. How these measures, from a Chancellor who specifically stated a lack of interest in the redistribution of wealth, will help the poor is not immediately apparent.

There were also whisperings about a reduction in stamp duty, confirmed by the Chancellor with news that stamp duty will be removed from properties worth up to £250,000 or £425,000 for first-time buyers purchasing properties for up to £625,000. Readers might recall that previous stamp duty holidays or cuts didn’t seem to reach purchasers, merely allowing vendors to increase selling prices. It will be interesting to see whether the same happens this time around. As for the suggestion floated by Liz Truss during her campaign that inheritance tax might be abolished, that may have to wait a year or two.

Replies (10)

Please login or register to join the discussion.

avatar
By schocca
23rd Sep 2022 11:48

Reversal of the recent IR35 reforms is a biggie for me... the fraud risks around the "umbrella companies" was/is going to be another scandal....

Thanks (1)
Replying to schocca:
avatar
By schocca
23rd Sep 2022 11:48

4.20 Repealing off-payroll working reforms – The 2017 and 2021 reforms to the offpayroll working rules (also known as IR35) will be repealed from 6 April 2023. From this date,
workers across the UK providing their services via an intermediary, such as a personal service
company, will once again be responsible for determining their employment status and paying
the appropriate amount of tax and NICs

Thanks (1)
Replying to schocca:
avatar
By Hugo Fair
23rd Sep 2022 18:17

So there's no repeal of basic IR35 ... just a reversion to the days when the responsibility & liability for determining the status and deducting tax/NI/etc lies with the worker.

Not much of a 'repeal' then ... and not noticeably to the advantage of contractors (who will no longer have a shield to hide behind when HMRC come calling).

Thanks (2)
avatar
By geoffmw1
23rd Sep 2022 12:14

Nothing about raising the IHT threshhold or reducing its rate.

Thanks (0)
Replying to geoffmw1:
avatar
By Hugo Fair
23rd Sep 2022 18:19

Well more voters are alive than dead (although I sometimes wonder)!

Thanks (1)
Replying to Hugo Fair:
paddle steamer
By DJKL
26th Sep 2022 16:22

IHT is really a tax on the kids not their parents. (Frankly they ought to be grateful to get anything)

Thanks (1)
Replying to DJKL:
avatar
By Hugo Fair
26th Sep 2022 17:05

Quite ... but who's to blame for their inflated expectations? I can't speak for you but I'm looking stonily in the mirror at my own reflection.

I can't remember an equivalent conversation with either of my kids in the past ... but 50 years ago:
* My dad decides to get himself the car he'd 'always deserved' (the 2002 model from this new company called BMW).
I immediately spot that the aging Triumph 1300 will be superfluous to needs so offer to 'take it off his hands' - and unsuspectingly agree to go for a walk with him.
Wondering why we've stopped by the nearest 2nd-hand car dealers ... I find myself being told how much they've offered him for the Triumph - and told that I can have a £50 'family discount' if I want to buy it!
Seething gently, I accept (after all I know it's maintenance history & condition) - and look after it much better than I suspect might have been the case with a gift.

[N.B: £50 was a lot of money then - making it, just, feasible for me to buy the car].

Thanks (1)
Replying to Hugo Fair:
paddle steamer
By DJKL
26th Sep 2022 17:32

I do accept the mirror point, mine are both currently living back home (Though son now has his US Green Card so is interviewing for jobs there and will depart next 6-8 weeks I expect) , food and all costs met by us though we did get the extra insurance premium back from son after sticking him on our car insurances; worst of all they even drink my beer (though at least they do now ask first.)

My dad was slightly more generous than yours, when in circa 1982 my very old Cortina was past repair and I sold it for £50 (I had bought it for £80 circa 1980) he then accepted the £50 for his 1974 Escort (only 49k on clock but tin worm was developing) which was below market value. (When the sills went I paid for them by working in his office in the evenings for a few weeks)

I do get your point, whilst I got assisted with loans they were still loans, with interest charged at x over base; for instance he lent me £4k in 1985 re my postgrad, documented by a loan agreement signed and witnessed and £20k in 1989 against the purchase from him of his Edinburgh flat for £50k and his arranging with the bank (who lent me most of the rest of the price) to hold a second ranking standard security. Both loans were expected to be, and were, repaid in full.

Thanks (1)
avatar
By Hugo Fair
23rd Sep 2022 13:48

There's been a lot of talk of Truss+ = Trump ... but I hadn't realised it went as far as fundamentalist but misconstrued Christian ideology:

"For whoever has, more will be given to him, and he will have more than enough; but whoever does not have, even what he has will be taken away from him"

Thanks (2)
Replying to Hugo Fair:
paddle steamer
By DJKL
26th Sep 2022 16:27

Hugo Fair wrote:

There's been a lot of talk of Truss+ = Trump ... but I hadn't realised it went as far as fundamentalist but misconstrued Christian ideology:

"For whoever has, more will be given to him, and he will have more than enough; but whoever does not have, even what he has will be taken away from him"

From Kwasi's speeches to the Faithful ( Not available within his Big Red Bok)

Thanks (0)