Tax relief on training costs
Employees who pay for their own training may seek a tax deduction for those costs, but that is not normally permissible, as Jane Wanless explains.
Replies (4)
Please login or register to join the discussion.
All correct - but wholly unsurprising, since nothing in this area has changed?
What I can never get a definitive answer on is in situations where a contract of employment states that if the employee hands in their notice within 3 years of starting, they have to reimburse the employer for CPD training costs. I don't see why "Salary Sacrifice" can't be used as surely then the training costs technically fall back on the employer. Has anyone had any experience of these contracts which seem increasingly commonplace?
You'll have to explain in a bit more detail how you see Sal Sac helping if you want a serious critique ... but:
* Sal Sac is a reduction in contractual salary (not just a deduction from it) and cannot be implemented retrospectively;
* If Sal Sac was used (at the time) for provision of external Training courses, then that means the employee is 'paying' for the courses (not the employer);
* If the EE subsequently leaves then he/she has still paid for the courses.
The contracts which you say "seem increasingly commonplace" have been fairly standard for over 40 years - particularly within professional services firms.
The employer pays (because they hope to have a more qualified member of staff without the rigmarole & uncertainty of recruiting externally) - but has no wish to then find the now more valuable employee promptly leaving for pastures new.
So it's common to have a clawback term (enabling the costs to be deducted from earnings or by other means) if the employee leaves within a specified duration of the training course end.
How does Sal Sac fit in with any of this?
HMRC is as ever being totally unimaginative and is doing absolutely nothing to encourage adult education in-career or to retrain into a new sector. The UK is terribly short of IT workers, STEM teachers, medics, construction workers, you name it, but government and the big companies is largely only interested in education for young people.
I had to laugh hollowly too at this notion of an employer ever paying for training. My wife works as a speech pathologist for the NHS and she's only been reimbursed for perhaps one in 10 of the training courses she's undertaken over the years to improve her skillset. The NHS is perfectly happy to instruct her to undertake new duties using her improved skills she's paid for from her own pocket, but resolutely refuses to pay a penny towards the training, and of course there's no chance of extra salary or enhanced career prospects within the organisation. And they wonder why they find it so hard to recruit and retain staff!