Independent VAT Consultant
Share this content

VAT: Rowing with the tide


Swanage Sea Rowing Club won its VAT case about zero-rating the building work on its new boathouse, much to Neil Warren’s surprise.

12th Feb 2021
Independent VAT Consultant
Share this content

It is well known that builder services supplied to a charity can be zero-rated if they relate to a new building that will be used solely for a relevant charitable purpose, eg a place of worship. To qualify the zero rating the building should not be used for any business supplies, only for the good causes and activities of the charity. There is a 5% de minimis exception for business use (VAT Notice 708, para 17.11).

A condition of zero-rating is that the charity must issue a certificate to the builder, meeting the conditions laid out in VAT Notice 708, section 18. HMRC can issue a 20% penalty to a charity if it issues an incorrect certificate. This is the same amount as the ‘lost VAT’ caused by incorrect zero-rating.

The case

The issue in the case of Swanage Sea Rowing Club (TC7904) was whether the new boathouse built to house its boats qualified for zero-rating.

HMRC said ‘no’ because the charity collected annual subscription fees and rowing session charges of about £8,000 per year, which was classed as business income.

The tribunal agreed with HMRC. The taxpayer claimed it had a ‘reasonable excuse’ for issuing a zero-rated certificate to the builder because it had discussed the VAT issues with HMRC’s Charity Helpline, and was convinced the work should be zero-rated. If this argument held, the penalty issued by HMRC should be withdrawn

Register for free to continue reading

It’s 100% free and provides unlimited access to the latest accounting news, advice and insight every day. As well as access to this exclusive article, you can:

View all AccountingWEB content
Comment on articles
Watch our digital shows and more

Access content now

Already have an account?

Replies (2)

Please login or register to join the discussion.

By Paul Crowley
12th Feb 2021 16:08

The one that got away
Based sole ly on a fishy phone call where charity talked about donations.

Still worth a punt for others to copy when they know full well that they are not entitled.

I am amazed that the call was justification.
Any business ever got away with no VAT based on HMRC unrecorded call?

Thanks (1)
By Echo761
15th Feb 2021 11:06

A good example of legitimate expectation... but without the normal evidence. It highlights lack of good training for staff and anyone with experience remaining in HMRC.

Thanks (2)