Capital gains hit and inheritance tax frozen
In Jeremy Hunt’s Autumn Statement, capital gains tax annual exemption was cut while inheritance tax nil rate bands were frozen.
Replies (11)
Please login or register to join the discussion.
Sorry to be picky but ... "The residence nil rate band can only be claimed where the deceased’s main home is left to a direct descendant, step-child or adopted child. It thus discriminates against the childless."
It *may* discriminate against the beneficiaries of the childless, but not the deceased (who is likely to have more weighty non-Tax issues on what if anything remains of their mind).
More seriously ... "Business owners who are planning to sell their business need to consider whether accelerating that process to before April 2023 would be beneficial, so they can take advantage of the higher CGT exemption on offer in this tax year".
Really? I can't imagine that avoiding £600 of tax by rushing the sale of a business would be a sensible decision in the vast majority of cases.
I've not seen the TIIN (if it yet exists) for the proposed halving of the CGT annual exemption - and then halving it again - but ...
I would expect the increase in tax take to be dwarfed by the increase in administration just for HMRC (let alone for all the benighted taxpayers suddenly within the net).
And that's without trying to guess the level of non-compliance (whether unintentional or deliberate) ... not just from savers/investors dabbling in Stocks ... leading to extra 'policing' costs (on top of the increased operational/administration costs).
I know plenty of people who made an unexpected ('windfall' if you will) gain when selling an asset during the pandemic - such as a pre-ordered car for which the waiting-list had become lengthy from the manufacturer/importer.
These kind of examples will increase in a time of rampant inflation - even if the seller isn't making a 'real' profit (especially if going on to buy a replacement).
And of course most if not all such transactions are not part of a trade.
Typically that didn't use to matter (as you'd have to be wealthy to be dabbling in cars that gave you back a near instant gain in excess of £12,300) - but with an exemption of only £3k?
Agree entirely
This admin is going to leave a lot of people with unknown accidental evasion, and ever such a lot of extra tax returns for trivial sums.
HMRC admin will crash and burn, given that they cannot cope with current workload.
I've always thought cars were wasting assets and therefore outside the scope of CGT. When did they become chargeable?
Good point (and one made by those encouraging investment in them or indeed in 'fine wine') ... but not always accepted by HMRC given the room for interpretation allowed by TCGA 1992.
And they have a point if you look at the prices being obtained at specialist auction rooms for 'classic cars' from before 1973. The '50 year lifetime' guide is under fire.
I would think that anyone who was being asked to pay CGT on a car would be well advised to quote CG76906 - Wasting assets: road vehicles
That only applies to "other" road vehicles. Passenger cars are explicitly excluded even if capital allowances have been claimed. ie the maximum balancing charge is the original cost. Any surplus is not chargeable to CGT.
Who is Jezza kidding? He might as well have scrapped the dividend allowance altogether - £500 - huh? The insurer Aviva pays more than that on its' own to anyone with a 'modest' stake.
Queue a massive share disposal before next April.
Typical accountants moan moan moan.
Just re-invest in EIS help a UK company or two and hey presto gain deferred and extra gain from EIS tax free.