Finance Bill 2012: Government defers residency test

Kashflow logo
Robert Lovell
Share this content

The government has postponed for a full year the introduction of a statutory residence test, despite a successful consultation over the summer which would have given individuals some much needed certainty about their status.

As revealed today, the surprising omission to the Finance Bill clauses relates to the test which most commentators had anticipated being announced today. The government announced in the Budget earlier this year its intention to introduce the test in the Finance Bill 2012.

David Gauke told TAXtv that the statutory residence test would be delayed for 12 months because there were “difficult issues to address” which, he was keen to point out, was “why the matter has not been dealt with before”. He said the government “remained committed to the statutory residence test” and that George Osborne would be giving details of the next step in the spring budget with draft legislation expected at this time next year and a new anticipated introduction from 6 April 2013.

[Update: the details were set out in ministerial statement today.]

In October Robert Gaines Cooper took a judicial review to the Supreme Court against the UK tax authorities, claiming (along with two others) that they had failed to stick to published guidance and had significantly changed their practice on tax residence.

The Supreme Court rejected the allegations, however, the law lords were critical of the guidance as “unclear” and “ambiguous”.

Please Login or Register to read the full article

The full article is available to registered members only. To read the rest of this article you’ll need to login or register. Registration is FREE and allows you to view all content, ask questions, comment and much more.


Please login or register to join the discussion.

13th Mar 2012 15:59

A frustration

We have found the delay to the Statutory Residence Test to be frustrating for one an all.  HMRC of course need time to consider the various issues following the public consultation, but the concern is over whether there will be significant changes to the previously proposed measures.





Thanks (0)