Tax lawyer and writer Tax Notes
Share this content

Sheltering property gains behind an EIS investment

1st Sep 2016
Tax lawyer and writer Tax Notes
Share this content
sheltering property

This idea has legal legs but it also carries significant risks for the taxpayer.

In an earlier article, Rebecca Cave outlined an idea for reducing CGT by 8% points on residential property, by using the CGT deferral relief offered by the Enterprise Investment Scheme (EIS). Not only does this idea defer the gain to a later date, but it has the effect of reducing the tax rate from 18%/28% to the new standard rates of 10%/20%.

Why does this work in tax terms?

In order to shelter a capital gain under the EIS Scheme, a person must subscribe for shares in a company which satisfies the relevant conditions. The investment must be made within three years of the gain arising, or the gain can be sheltered behind an investment made in the previous 12 months.

Although most people would normally claim the upfront income tax relief on the EIS shares, it isn’t actually necessary to do so. In fact the conditions for the CGT deferral relief under EIS, while similar, do not exactly match those necessary for the income tax relief.

The deferred gain is always brought back into charge, usually when the shares are sold, but also if and when the relevant conditions for EIS have been broken. It is also possible to rollover the gain into another EIS investment.

The key question for the taxpayer is: “What tax rate will apply to the gain when it is eventually taxed?

For residential property gains, there are two options (TCGA 1992 Sch 5B, paras 2, 4):

  1. since the gain is one that arose from the disposal of residential property, the 18%/28% rates should apply; or
  2. standard rates should apply on the basis that the gain has become divorced from the original disposal. The gain is said to accrue, and the legislation gives instructions for calculating how much is to be taxed, but there is no specific provision that deems the gain to be one arising from a particular asset disposal (the residential property).

Support for the second option can be found by comparing the position to the way that gains are deferred when the original asset disposal qualifies for entrepreneurs’ relief. In order to benefit from the special 10% rate when the deferred gain is brought back into charge, the legislation specifically deems this to be a gain that qualifies for entrepreneurs’ relief (TCGA 1992 ss 169T–169V).

How could you use EIS to defer a property gain?

The following is an outline of how a taxpayer could use a series of EIS investments to reduce the tax rate on a residential property gain to standard CGT rates, while withdrawing the sale proceeds over a period of time. The individual would need to subscribe for a mixture of EIS shares as follows:

  1. Subscribe for EIS shares which qualify for the CGT deferral relief, with no claim being made for the income tax relief. These shares can be sold at any time within the three-year lock-in period that normally applies to an EIS investment – no income tax relief is clawed back because none is given. There is of course CGT to pay on any gains made on the EIS shares themselves.
  2. Subscribe for EIS shares which qualify for the income tax relief, which can be sold after the three-year lock-in period is over and when the relief can't be clawed back. Gains on these EIS shares are also exempt from CGT after three years.

What are the downsides?

This is not a venture that should be undertaken without a great deal of thought.

The most important downside is that of investment risk. The taxpayer is exchanging a relatively safe investment (property) for something a lot riskier, which could end up losing a significant amount of money. Also the tax on the original gain still has to be paid at some point.

There are also practical difficulties. Who will actually buy the EIS shares? There isn’t a ready market for EIS shares which allows the investor to realise his investment on demand. While EIS shares can be quoted on AIM, they aren’t liquid stocks.

Should the taxpayer make the investment?

There are considerable downsides as just discussed. Investing in EIS just to shelter a tax gain isn’t really a good reason for investing in EIS. There are plenty of other tax breaks associated with EIS, but remember it’s an investment first and should be approached in this light. However, for taxpayers who are already planning to make an EIS investment, if they also have a substantial property gain, using a tax shelter may be a viable option, provided the taxpayer is willing to take the risk.

Replies (6)

Please login or register to join the discussion.

By Scott Hallesy
02nd Sep 2016 10:15

This assumes of course that the property gain you've made is deemed to be a CG and not a development trade profit; the changes outlined in clauses 75 et seq of FB2016 may change the tax profile of many transactions despite the promise to limit them to egregious avoidance cases.

Thanks (4)
By Andy L
05th Sep 2016 11:18

"the gain has become divorced from the original disposal. The gain is said to accrue, and the legislation gives instructions for calculating how much is to be taxed, but there is no specific provision that deems the gain to be one arising from a particular asset disposal (the residential property)."

Are we sure about this?

Surely the legislation states that the original gain woul have accrued on a relevant business disposal?

HMRC guidance continues to state "Eligibility for relief will be determined under the rules which applied at the time of the first disposal"

Any clarification on that please?

Thanks (0)
Replying to Andy L:
By AndyJR81
07th Sep 2016 18:16

You can defer a gain on any asset using an EIS investment - it doesn't need to be a business disposal.

Thanks (0)
Replying to AndyJR81:
By Andy L
09th Sep 2016 10:55

Yes of course but that doesn't mean the gain is then divorced from the original disposal. The gain coming back to charge is treated as having the same asset status as on the original disposal so it isn't divorced.

It is of course taxed at current rates, so in the past you could defer a gain and if the CGT rate subsequently went down then you'd done well, but based on previous principles that would mean that a deferred residential property gain would still be a residential property gain when it was brought back into charge.

Does the legislation not suggest this?

Thanks (0)
By Tom 7000
05th Sep 2016 11:33

Is skipping the income tax relief part of the plan to lose the cgt relief? To be honest I got a bit lost but the case below rang a bell...

Thanks (0)
Replying to Tom 7000:
By Andy L
05th Sep 2016 12:13

The article concerns deferral relief which is not dependent on claiming income tax relief. Indeed deferral relief can be claimed by an individual investor in cases where they do not qualify for income tax relief on the investment.

Thanks (0)