Dext announces end-to-end MTD ITSA solution for accountants
Accounting data extraction tool Dext has unveiled a solution for accountants and bookkeepers to submit directly to HMRC on behalf of self-employed and landlord clients under the upcoming Making Tax Digital for income tax self assessment regime.
You might also be interested in
Replies (14)
Please login or register to join the discussion.
I really don't get it ... isn't this basically just a system for bank-feed extraction linked to QU submissions by the sound of it?
Leaving aside all the references to "other features (being) added as the tool is further developed" and the cost (£100 pa for a single user small landlord) ... it can't possibly have a development plan for the non-QU elements of MTD ITSA (since HMRC don't appear to know themselves).
And what about those not using cash accounting or with a financial year not ending 5th April or with income from jointly owned assets or ... ?
It's just as important for advertorial to say who ISN'T a suitable user for the item being plugged, as it is to say who might benefit from it.
What you see is what you get
£100 per person is more than I am prepared to suggest clients pay unless clients are already tech aware
I really don't get it ... isn't this basically just a system for bank-feed extraction linked to QU submissions by the sound of it?
I am slightly befuggled but i am presuming that they are looking to do an end to end solution to compete with the latest dumbed down quickbooks variety for sole traders. Or it might be they are happy so sell something that does mtd and they can easily sell en masse but will be shafting unrepresented peeps / represented when it comes to year end (similar to quickbooks pretending their software is simple for their avergae user). Must admit we are one of the few accountants i think left that like to get the double entry right and vat correct - i think generally there must be lots of peeps not doing double entry submitting garbage to hmrc.
Its clear that dext to have the lead in "scanning supplier invoices" so they are obviously onto something but it is a long journey though to turn that into something that is fit form purpose to cheuck out a sole trader tax return - at least the quickbooks latest sole trader offering is coirrectly working back from what will end up on the tax return boxes for sole traders albeit it is probably over dumbed down ??
My annoyance with this area is how poor xero's scanning solution hubdoc is - everything is close to working but the way it works on the most basic level is so poorly setup up it annoys every person i have seen try to use it - i do use for a couple of clients though i must admit.
I really don't get it ... isn't this basically just a system for bank-feed extraction linked to QU submissions by the sound of it?
I am slightly befuggled but i am presuming that they are looking to do an end to end solution to compete with the latest dumbed down quickbooks variety for sole traders. Or it might be they are happy so sell something that does mtd and they can easily sell en masse but will be shafting unrepresented peeps / represented when it comes to year end (similar to quickbooks pretending their software is simple for their avergae user). Must admit we are one of the few accountants i think left that like to get the double entry right and vat correct - i think generally there must be lots of peeps not doing double entry submitting garbage to hmrc.
Its clear that dext to have the lead in "scanning supplier invoices" so they are obviously onto something but it is a long journey though to turn that into something that is fit form purpose to cheuck out a sole trader tax return - at least the quickbooks latest sole trader offering is coirrectly working back from what will end up on the tax return boxes for sole traders albeit it is probably over dumbed down ??
My annoyance with this area is how poor xero's scanning solution hubdoc is - everything is close to working but the way it works on the most basic level is so poorly setup up it annoys every person i have seen try to use it - i do use for a couple of clients though i must admit.
Sorry, speed read the thing. Thought it was the end (ie final) solution to MTD ITSA. No such luck apparently (yet).
"Smaller landlords don’t always have separate business bank accounts and may not want to provide their personal bank statement to an adviser for the 20 transactions a year that relate to the property,” said Lodder. “The alternative is to upload insurance or repairs invoice, plus using our manual mechanism to enter the rental income. We have that functionality in Dext Prepare and we’re not asking our customers to choose between data sources"
So you can basically write down through this software a list of your income and expenses with no double entry.
Like erm I dont know, a bit of paper, or my favourite tool Excel!
Sounds really worth the £72/year.
It's not the software that the problem . The problem is who is going to enter the data and make sure what is entered is accurate and reliable and how can it be done in a short filing window. I have a painter & decorator who has just let me have his 5th April 2022 records , we have completed the Accounts and Self Assessment - now the client says he is too busy working to even get them signed. I have quite a few others like this also. What on earth will happen.
This is the biggest issue of all. As accountants we have no hope whatsoever of being able to service our clients in a 1 month QU window. Realistically this will be more like a 2 week window as it will take time for the client to get the info entered and across, but many will leave it until the last minute. This is without the pressure of existing work, monitoring visits, broken bank feeds, sickness, staff holidays etc. The ONLY way to deal with this is to tell the clients to do the QU themselves.
Yaaaawwwwwwwwnnnnn.
I've got the perfect solution to MTD ITSA - do the sensible thing and pull the plug on it.
We aren't bothering to take on any self assessment "only" people as we can't be arsed to deal with the absolute crapfest.
Our current clients have already been informed they'll (as it stands) being going over to our chosen provider and there will be costs involved for software and our time.
If MTDITSA does go ahead (I think it will too many companies have invested a lot of time / money and Govt don't have the balls to backtrack) then the tax gap will definitely increase, from the attempts I have come across of people DIYing their MTD, HMRC are going to be flooded with returns they have no manpower or expertise to check, many people will claim stuff they shouldn't and all this will result in less tax taken by HMRC, but as long as their software lobbyist friends are okay, that's all that matters.
I actually agree with the principle of MTD for VAT registered businesses, spreading it to cover anything outside of that is a huge no for me, scrap it!
I don't see how one can offer a solution to something that has not - and more than likely not to - happen. Administration gone mad.
The software industry has already creamed enough £££s of people for something that will likely not happen in its first announced form, if at all